AI Rate Professor

Law

Robert Dagmy

CON1 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
23/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you can self-teach and , though the single online review is much more favorable.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf Teaching RequiredHard TestsExtra CreditLenient OnlinePoor In-Person Lectures
  • and describes him as engaging, lenient, and doable.
  • In-person reviews are mostly negative, saying students must teach themselves and .
  • The biggest risk is that .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

and leniency help, but and self-teaching make the A costly, especially in person.

The online review suggests a doable and lenient class, while and heavy self-teaching.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The material becomes difficult because lectures are described as ineffective and students must learn much of it independently.

Online evidence sounds manageable, but poor lecture support.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews mention participation and engagement but do .

Neither online nor in-person reviews clearly establish the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most students do not recommend him because in-person instruction is weak and .

Online evidence is positive, but the and drive the overall recommendation down.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

The online review calls him lenient and mentions , but and poor alignment.

Format shift

, while because tests are hard.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Assignments are described as average and doable, but self-teaching and .

Format shift

Online workload sounds manageable, while because students must compensate for weak lectures.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

One online student praises his engagement, but material well.

Format shift

Teaching quality differs sharply by format, with online positive and in-person mostly poor.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and hard tests, suggesting both coursework and exams matter.

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes assignments, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, emphasizing weak lectures, self-teaching, and .

Main concern

Students say they learned better alone and that .

What students said

“I didn't learn anything from his lectures.”
CON1
“Beware with the tests tho.”
CON1
“Cannot teach at all and you will have to go home and teach yourself the whole course.”
CON1

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online review is , and helpful engagement.

Main concern

Only one online review supports this positive picture.

What students said

“ , but doable.”
CON1
“Good sense of humor as well, and very lenient.”
CON1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because in-person reviews explicitly describe hard, closed-resource tests with uncovered questions.

Hard TestsNot Open BookNot Open NotesQuestions Not Covered

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews explicitly describe hard tests, including tests that are not open book or open notes and may include uncovered questions.

Hard TestsNot Open BookNot Open NotesQuestions Not Covered
“The .”
CON1
“He adds questions that are not covered in the book nor lectures and !”
CON1

Online

The online review does not clearly .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Cannot teach at all and you will have to go home and teach yourself the whole course.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

30/100

“ unless i have no other choice.”

📝

25/100

“He adds questions that are not covered in the book nor lectures and !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He engages and is open to answering any questions.
  • I didn't learn anything from his lectures.
  • Cannot teach at all and you will have to go home and teach yourself the whole course.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , but doable.
  • The .
  • Beware with the tests tho.

Theme 3

⚖️ About Format Difference

  • Good sense of humor as well, and very lenient.
  • I was better off learning the material on my own.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 5 recent reviews give detailed patterns, but the online sample is only one review and sharply conflicts with .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CON15 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1