AI Rate Professor

Biology

Erin Jacobs

Courses not reported · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
52%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Take Jacobs if you can study consistently from slides, but avoid her if you .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear SlidesCaring but PolarizingTest HeavyTough Lab GradingContent Dense
  • Students agree Anatomy and Physiology are content-heavy and require steady studying.
  • , and a caring attitude.
  • Negative reviews , and exam-heavy grading.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

57/100

A strong grade is realistic for steady students, but the , and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The course content is consistently described as dense, fast, and difficult even by students who liked her.

Only in-person evidence is available, and .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

Attendance and participation appear important, especially for lecture and lab credit, but reviews.

Only in-person reviews discuss attendance, with some comments saying participation matters and one describing waiting for .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

and fairness, but many strongly warn against her teaching and .

All recommendation evidence is in person, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

31/100

as tough, especially for exams, lab practicals, spelling deductions, and few high-weight assessments.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Homework is not always heavy, but the study load is high because exams and .

Format shift

and heavy studying, with no online evidence.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Teaching feedback is polarized, with many students praising clear explanations and many others calling lectures boring or unhelpful.

Format shift

, and they show a strong split.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Grades appear , and test performance rather than broad assignment variety.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are sharply split, with while others report boring lectures and .

Main concern

The main risk is a dense, test-heavy course with .

What students said

“The class is difficult in terms of how much content there is to know, but if you put in the work it is completely doable.”
10543
“ and she never tries to trick you with any questions.”
10548
“The exams are worth 60% of your grade so better be a .”
10543

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally lecture-slide based and fair for prepared students, but the course is test-heavy with .

Exam HeavyLecture-Slide Based ExamsLab PracticalsFew High-Weight Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention lecture-based exams, difficult tests, lab practicals, and high exam weight, but .

Lecture-Slide Based ExamsLab PracticalsExams Worth 60 PercentNo Clear Open-Book Evidence
“ and are very fair.”
10543
“The exams are worth 60% of your grade so better be a .”
10543
“ , and she will mark you down for misspelled words.”
10543

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The class is difficult in terms of how much content there is to know, but if you put in the work it is completely doable.”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“ and .”

📚 Course Difficulty

34/100

“There is so much information thrown at you all at once and she will not give a study guide.”

⚖️

31/100

“Boring lectures and give way too much homeworks. and and deduction for misspeled words (Pun intended)”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and her tests are predictable and fair.
  • all she does is read off of ppt slides. lectures are so boring and not engaging at all.
  • Dr. Jacobs is an amazing professor who truly cares about her students and is great at explaining the material clearly.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • You have to put a lot of effort into the class.
  • The exams are worth 60% of your grade so better be a .
  • but just review the material and make sure to understand it and you should be good!

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams and Labs

  • The lab books have everything you need to study for .
  • , and she will mark you down for misspelled words.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

89/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 25 recent in-person reviews provide detailed, consistent themes despite polarized opinions.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 59

Course coverage

1054321 reviews
105484 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 1 · A 9 · A- 2

B range

6

B+ 3 · B 3

C range

3

C 1 · C- 2

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 2