AI Rate Professor

Biology

Kevin Davis

Courses not reported · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid Davis unless and can teach yourself a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedHarsh GraderLate to ClassConfusing ExamsDisrespectful Tone
  • All four reviews rate him at the lowest quality level and .
  • Students describe , and disrespectful behavior.
  • The course is described as extremely difficult, test-heavy, and graded harshly.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Students describe , and , so an A appears very hard to earn.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

16/100

The content is described as heavy and and vague exams.

, and it consistently describes high difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

, but repeated lateness and classroom participation issues make the format feel inflexible.

and attendance-related problems.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

2/100

Students overwhelmingly warn against him because of , and .

All recommendation evidence is in person, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

, and a high risk of poor outcomes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

The workload feels overwhelming because students report heavy content and needing extreme daily study to survive exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students describe unclear lectures, poor organization, lateness, mockery, and little useful support.

Format shift

, and they are consistently negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

, and few high-impact graded items.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are uniformly negative, , and hostile classroom interactions.

Main concern

The main concern is an unstructured class with harsh exams and poor student support.

What students said

“Lectures were the textbook mumbled aloud.”
80449
“guaranteed to fail if you didn't study like 6hours a day.”
80449
“He came into class late everyday.”
80449

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as vague, confusing, and harshly graded, but reviews .

Confusing ExamsTest HeavyVague QuestionsFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Strict

12/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and difficult exams, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, or closed-book policies.

Confusing ExamsMultiple Choice TestsDiagram HeavyNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ , and unrelated to anything taught.”
80449
“the and the diagrams were the worst!”
80449
“guaranteed to fail if you didn't study like 6hours a day.”
80449

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom climate. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation Rate

2/100

“ .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“Lectures were the textbook mumbled aloud.”

⚖️

8/100

“ , and unrelated to anything taught.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures were the textbook mumbled aloud.
  • He came into class late everyday.
  • and has an attitude towards his students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • guaranteed to fail if you didn't study like 6hours a day.
  • The content of the class heavy and there is a lot of material to cover.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • Singled out quieter students to mock.
  • he snickered/giggled at some students who asked simple question.
  • It made me feel uncomfortable and he likes to call on people on class who are "quiet".

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are only four reviews, but they are recent, detailed, and highly consistent.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

804494 reviews

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1