AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jamie Goodale

MATH · MATH109 · MATH121 · MATHMATH · MATH105 · MATH103 · 105SPRING05 · MATH101 · MAT121 · MATH104 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
33/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you can learn math independently, keep up with fast lectures, and prepare heavily for exams.

Best fit · Self Taught ProFast lecturesHeavy homeworkTough examsMixed clarityPersonable but inconsistent
  • Students often describe Goodale as kind or energetic, but many say her teaching is too fast and unclear.
  • and strong math independence, with little tolerance for weak test performance.
  • single online review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A appears possible only with , and solid test performance.

The single online review says effort can work, while and heavy preparation.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Math content is made harder by fast pacing, skipped steps, and tests that some students say differ from practice.

Online evidence is mildly positive, but .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as formally mandatory, but students say showing up is important to survive the pace.

The online review says to show up, while but does not always solve clarity issues.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Recommendation is low because many , and poorly aligned with tests.

The only online review recommends her, but most detailed in-person evidence is much more cautious or negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Students report , and tests that require exact preparation.

Format shift

Strict grading evidence .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Many reviews mention lots of , and difficult preparation for quizzes and exams.

Format shift

The online review also mentions homework, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

43/100

She is often described as nice, but many students say .

Format shift

Online evidence is positive, but the and often negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews emphasize , and test performance as the main grade drivers.

Format shift

Both formats mention homework and test difficulty.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed to negative, with repeated complaints , and limited clarity.

Main concern

Students who need slow explanations or strong guidance may struggle.

What students said

“Lectures were too fast and stopped often for personal stories.”
MATH103
“Lectures are too fast and majority of people in the class dropped.”
MATH105
“ .”
MATH121

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The only online review is positive but still says pre-calculus is not easy and and homework.

Main concern

The online evidence is too limited to generalize confidently.

What students said

“Pre-calculus is not easy, but as long as you show up to class and !”
MATH109

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence suggests strict, high-stakes math tests with limited partial credit and inconsistent alignment in some classes.

Tough ExamsMinimal Partial CreditReview SheetsHomework-Based Practice

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

partial credit, and sometimes mismatched exam problems, but not proctoring or open-book rules.

Minimal Partial CreditTough TestsReview SheetsNo Clear Open-Book Evidence
“Minimal partial credit.”
MATH
“0 curve.”
MAT121
“ .”
MATH105

Online

The only online review does not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Super Nice. Not a great teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching clarity, workload, and ; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

43/100

“I can tell that Jayme is a good person, but she is not a good teacher.”

📈 Difficulty and Grades

35/100

“You really have to work to pass this class.”

🧪

32/100

“Values a correct numerical value over your process.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She moves rather quickly through the lectures.
  • She managed to make the material feel foreign to me.
  • Sometimes I wonder if she's talking to herself or lecturing...

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • You must study constantly or .
  • If you do all of the homework and reviews, and understand those, you can get an A in the class.
  • Any Grade is possible just depends on your effort.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Exams and Workload

  • , and homework.
  • the homework but the concepts are the same.
  • Complains about the poor quality of the book while continuing to assign pointless problems

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 23 reviews span many years and repeat consistent themes, though only one online review limits online confidence.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 54
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH1045 reviews
MATH1055 reviews
MAT1213 reviews
MATH2 reviews
MATH1032 reviews
Show 6 more courses
105031 review
105SPRING051 review
MATH1011 review
MATH1091 review
MATH1211 review
MATHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1