AI Rate Professor

English

Alicia Pasquel

ENGL92 · ENGLISH120AC · ENG98 · ENGLISH92 · ENGL120AC · 120AC · 238AC · ENGLISH155 · ENGL092 · ENGL150 · ENGL78 · HUM101 · ENG150 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
99/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
93.75%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take her if you want a and real improvement.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring MentorImprovement Based GradingEngaging DiscussionsParticipation MattersHelpful Feedback
  • Students overwhelmingly describe her as caring, energetic, and deeply invested in their writing growth.
  • Grades are not a free A, but , and improvement are strongly rewarded.
  • Workload is moderate for writing classes, with papers and prep work but and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

An A is very achievable if students attend, participate, revise, and show improvement, but it is not an effortless grade.

Online evidence is positive but limited to one review, while grading.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course feels approachable because she gives strong support and feedback, though writing growth still takes steady work.

Online evidence says lectures are clear, while , and revision drive success.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

because , and in-class work affect success and sometimes grades.

Online attendance evidence is limited, while and participating.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and effective at improving writing.

Both formats are positive, but the recommendation score is .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

She can grade tough on papers, but , and improvement.

Format shift

Online evidence is too limited for grading detail, while .

Workload

Moderate

62/100

, and revision, but students do not describe it as overwhelming.

Format shift

Online workload evidence is unclear, while and steady class participation.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students repeatedly praise her as , and highly invested in student success.

Format shift

The one online review is positive, and the .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment is centered on papers, writing improvement, participation, prep work, and peer review rather than exams.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide nearly all assessment evidence, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews strongly praise , and growth-based grading.

Main concern

Attendance and participation matter, and .

What students said

“ and it is very clear she wants everyone in her class to succeed.”
English155
“She is not an easy A - you have to work for it!”
ENGL120AC
“ and you will get graded down for not participating.”
ENG150

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review describes a .

Main concern

Online evidence is very limited because there is only one review.

What students said

“Very good teacher and well-explained lectures.”
ENGL120AC

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a consistent exam format, proctoring policy, open-book policy, midterm format, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and peer review, but do not clearly prove exam policy.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, webcam use, proctoring, open-book policy, midterm format, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Meg is the life.”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and participation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Meg is the .”

📈 Effort For An A

72/100

“She is not an easy A - you have to work for it!”

👍 Recommendation Level

95/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are energetic and fun.
  • She plans her lessons around what the class needs.
  • She is really clear about what she expects from your writing.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Improvement

  • She grades you based on your progression in the class.
  • If she sees you are trying and working hard you will pass with flying colors.
  • As long as your writing improves throughout the semester, you could wind up with an A in her class.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support And Character

  • She truly cares about opening her students up to different perspectives.
  • .
  • She was so helpful and fun!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 29 reviews span many years and , and .

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 526
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGL120AC5 reviews
ENG1504 reviews
ENGL1503 reviews
ENGLISH120AC3 reviews
HUM1013 reviews
Show 8 more courses
ENG982 reviews
English1552 reviews
ENGLISH922 reviews
120AC1 review
238AC1 review
ENGL0921 review
ENGL781 review
ENGL921 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

10

A 8 · A- 2

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3