AI Rate Professor

Art

Carol Lefkowitz

ARTART · ART101 · ART145 · ART150 · WATERCOLORS · ART130 · ART131 · 36 lifetime ratings

AI rating
67/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you want serious artistic growth and can , and a demanding studio environment.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPassionate mentorRigorous workloadStrong feedbackParticipation heavyPolarizing style
  • Students often describe major artistic growth when they attend, participate, and accept critique.
  • The workload is consistently heavy, with and long classes.
  • Reviews are sharply polarized, with some students praising her dedication and others reporting harshness, favoritism, or poor accommodation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is realistic for students who show up, work hard, and improve, but it is not a low-effort art credit.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The course content is foundational but demanding because students must practice consistently and absorb frequent critique.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly treated as essential to passing and improving.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

Most positive reviewers strongly recommend her for serious growth, but negative reviews make the fit risk substantial.

The recommendation evidence is entirely in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Grades appear tied to effort and improvement, but several students describe subjective or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and major time demands.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Many , and skill-building, while a significant minority report harsh or uneven treatment.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment , and participation rather than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

but often transformative art instructor whose value depends heavily on student fit.

Main concern

Students who need gentle support or flexible accommodation may struggle with her direct style and heavy expectations.

What students said

“It is a rigorous class and will improve your skills if taken seriously.”
ART130
“If you're just looking for an easy class for easy credits, you won't find it here”
ART130
“she picks favorites the first week, they can do no wrong.”
ART130

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on studio work and critiques, and they do not clearly prove a .

Reviews do not clearly prove an exam policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Reviews do not clearly prove an exam policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It is a rigorous class and will improve your skills if taken seriously.”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ and committed to the artistic growth of each student.”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“Expects an enormous amount of work, in and out of class.”

⚖️ Fit Risk

70/100

“For some, this will be the worst.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is so engaged and inspiring, it is nearly impossible to not adopt her enthusiasm.
  • Carol provides constructive critiques in a supportive and inclusive classroom where students feel comfortable sharing their artistic journey.
  • The professor was just very bad at explaining what they expected.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you're just looking for an easy class for easy credits, you won't find it here
  • She gave lots of get more input before it was time to be turning in a project.
  • Her way of .

Theme 3

🧭 About Student Fit

  • If you go to class, give good effort, and dont make excuses, you'll do great.
  • not accommodating for students with mental health issues.
  • Do ur work, show up & ull have no problems!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

36

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-seven reviews across many years give rich, consistent evidence about workload, teaching style, and student fit despite polarized opinions.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ART13023 reviews
ART1014 reviews
ART1503 reviews
WATERCOLORS3 reviews
ART1312 reviews
Show 2 more courses
ART1451 review
ARTART1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

9

A 7 · A- 2

B range

6

B 4 · B- 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1