AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Robert Banos

ENG125 · ENGG125 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless you are comfortable learning independently and mainly need to complete the project requirements.

Best fit · Self Taught ProRecent teaching concernsSidetracked lecturesMixed historical reviewsProject-based gradingLow recommendation confidence
  • Recent reviews are strongly negative and describe poor teaching, distraction, and an unhelpful learning environment.
  • Older reviews are positive but much less current, so they carry less weight than the recent complaints.
  • The course may allow an A through project completion, but the learning experience appears unreliable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

One older review says students who completed the , but recent grades and comments show inconsistent outcomes.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Engineering content is described as complicated and .

; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do not clearly .

; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Recent reviews strongly discourage him because they describe poor teaching, distraction, and a bad learning environment.

; there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

Grading appears project-based and possibly lenient for completion, but recent low grades and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, with older leniency evidence conflicting with recent negative outcomes.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Tags mention pop quizzes and many papers, and the challenging skill set likely requires substantial independent effort.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and no online workload evidence is available.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Recent reviews heavily criticize his teaching clarity and classroom focus despite older positive comments.

Format shift

negative than older evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and few graded items more than traditional exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, with assessment evidence centered on projects and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person evidence is sharply split, with recent reviews criticizing teaching while older reviews praise his kindness and .

Main concern

Recent students say he cannot teach clearly and gets sidetracked.

What students said

“He can not teach anything if his life depended on it”
ENG125
“He got sidetracked very easily and it was not a good learning environment.”
ENGG125

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a consistent exam policy, but and a .

Final ProjectPop QuizzesFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, midterm, or final exam rules.

Final ProjectPop QuizzesFew Graded Items
“Gave an A to all the students who completed the .”
ENGG125
“Beware of pop quizzes”
ENGG125

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He got sidetracked very easily and it was not a good learning environment.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, weighing recent comments more heavily while preserving older conflicting evidence; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“He can not teach anything if his life depended on it”

👍 Recommendation Risk

24/100

“He was not very intouch with what he taught.”

⚖️ Grade Path

58/100

“Gave an A to all the students who completed the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He can not teach anything if his life depended on it
  • He got sidetracked very easily and it was not a good learning environment.
  • The instructor was very enthusiastic about teaching a very complicated skill set.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Gave an A to all the students who completed the .
  • Although it was challenging, he made the experience more enjoyable.

Theme 3

❤️ About Classroom Experience

  • Professor Banos was extremely nice and .
  • Laid back teacher, easy to get along with.
  • Mr Banos loves talking to girls more than actually teaching

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

54/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are only 6 reviews, recent comments are consistent but older positive reviews create time-based conflict.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENGG1254 reviews
ENG1252 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values