AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Maria Coulsen

Courses not reported · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
55.56%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you are ready to practice heavily and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHard testsLots of homeworkApproachable when engagedMixed teaching qualityRedemption opportunities
  • Students agree the math courses require heavy practice and .
  • In-person reviews are sharply split between great instruction and .
  • and fair to absent and unsupported.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A and practice, but and heavy workload prevent it from being an easy A.

but , while in-person evidence emphasizes difficult tests with some score redemption.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The course content is challenging because , and needing to work through many problems.

Both formats show challenge, with online students relying more on self-study and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, though participation and doing the work appear important.

Online reviews emphasize completing asynchronous work, while in-person reviews mention participation but do .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

56/100

Recommendations are mixed because some students love her humor and support while and poor experiences.

Online reviews are split between organized support and feeling abandoned, while and strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

helping but multiple students calling her a tough grader.

Format shift

and more forgiving through open-note tests, while because tests drive outcomes.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Workload is heavy because many reviews mention lots of , and the need for constant practice.

Format shift

Online reviews especially stress tons of homework, while and practice to survive tests.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with strong praise for approachability and humor balanced by complaints about absence, confusion, and unprofessional behavior.

Format shift

In-person teaching has stronger praise and stronger criticism, while online teaching depends heavily on self-guided materials.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Assessment appears test-heavy, with quizzes and but .

Format shift

Online reviews mention tests, quizzes, and homework, while and redemption quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students describe a funny and approachable instructor, but , and .

Main concern

The main concern is hard tests that .

What students said

“This is a difficult class, but she is a great instructor and .”
121
“The , but luckily there are redemption quizzes that .”
121
“ emphasized in the textbook nor in her lectures.”
124

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and fair open-note tests, but some felt she was absent or the workload was heavy.

Main concern

The main concern is needing to , and homework.

What students said

“Tests and and open notes.”
115
“I found her to be totally absent for the online (asynchronous) version of the MCC class.”
115
“Do the work and you'll be fine.”
121

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because online reviews explicitly mention fair open-note tests, while and occasional redemption quizzes.

Open Notes OnlineHard TestsRedemption QuizzesTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and redemption quizzes, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring details.

Hard TestsRedemption QuizzesTest Heavy
“The , but luckily there are redemption quizzes that .”
121
“The grade-ruining aspect was that examples.”
121

Online

Online and quizzes, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, or Lockdown Browser policies.

Open NotesFair TestsQuizzes
“Tests and and open notes.”
115

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is a difficult class, but she is a great instructor and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“This is a difficult class, but she is a great instructor and .”

📚 Workload Reality

30/100

“Be ready to read, watch videos and do tons of homework.”

🧪

55/100

“The , but luckily there are redemption quizzes that .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is also absolutely hilarious!
  • and she helped me out.
  • Very unprofessional with a lackluster lecture.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Do the work and you'll be fine.
  • The , but luckily there are redemption quizzes that .
  • do few, expect few points, do a lot, you will get an A.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • .
  • I found her to be totally absent for the online (asynchronous) version of the MCC class.
  • Tests and and open notes.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 9 recent reviews give detailed but highly polarized evidence across formats.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

1214 reviews
1153 reviews
1242 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1