AI Rate Professor

Music

Mark Culbertson

MUS105 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid this class unless you are comfortable with , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh gradingHeavy writingAI accusation concernsNo late work mercyAvoid if seeking easy arts credit
  • Most students describe MUS105 as far harder and more stressful than expected.
  • The , and AI-related zeroes or fear of accusations.
  • Only one review is clearly positive, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because students , and withdrawals despite major effort.

Online evidence overwhelmingly shows high effort and stress, while the .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

The course feels much harder than expected because students compare it to graduate-level analysis and stressful STEM-level work.

Online reviews drive the strongest difficulty evidence, and the .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

35/100

, but deadline flexibility is very low due to repeated no-late-work complaints.

Online and in-person reviews both emphasize strict .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

17/100

Most students strongly recommend avoiding the class because the workload and and stressful.

Online reviews are strongly negative overall, and the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

as extremely harsh, especially around AI accusations, different opinions, and no rewrite opportunities.

Format shift

Online , while the in-person review also reports zeroes for AI flags.

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

Workload is overwhelming because students repeatedly mention extensive reading, writing, papers, and stress leading to withdrawals.

Format shift

Online reviews provide the clearest workload pattern, and the and papers.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Teaching experience is poor because most comments focus on stress, rigidity, and lack of constructive support.

Format shift

Online reviews are mostly severe and detailed, while the .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Assessment is assignment-driven, with papers, essays, reading responses, and writing quality dominating the complaints.

Format shift

Both .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single in-person review describes the class as extremely hard, strict on late work, and aggressive about AI flags.

Main concern

The main concern is zeroes for AI flags and no late work acceptance.

What students said

“The hardest class I have ever taken, anything that is college level writing, he flags it as AI and gives you a zero.”
MUS105

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are and writing, harsh grading, strict late policies, and stress over AI accusations.

Main concern

The and fear of AI accusations.

What students said

“This is not an easy class. .”
MUS105
“Assumes all work is AI and will not discuss it, a waste of months of hard work.”
MUS105
“ .”
MUS105

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an , and the course appears to .

No Clear Exam EvidenceWriting HeavyAssignment Based

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , Lockdown Browser, open-book exams, midterms, or finals.

No Clear Exam EvidenceWriting Heavy
“Get ready to read”
MUS105
“So many papers”
MUS105

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

No Clear Exam EvidenceWriting Heavy
“ .”
MUS105
“LOTS of reading and writing.”
MUS105

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is not an easy class. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation Risk

17/100

“This is not an easy class. .”

⚖️

8/100

“ .”

📝 Workload Pressure

10/100

“ .”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • " but flags ANY COLLEGE-LEVEL WRITING as AI.
  • Grades you down for having a different opinion than him.
  • Does not show mercy for .

Theme 2

📝 About Workload

  • This is a reading and writing class.
  • LOTS of reading and writing.
  • So many papers

Theme 3

🚨 About Student Experience

  • The most stressed I've ever been about a class, and I ended up withdrawing because .
  • This was the most difficult class I've ever taken at COM after 3 years of full time.
  • Love music, so I took MUS 105 - huge regret.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

76/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 6 recent reviews are detailed and consistent, though most cover one online course with .

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MUS1056 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Rather not say 1