AI Rate Professor

Biology

Parisa Roghani

Courses not reported · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you value clear anatomy explanations enough to risk inconsistent organization and serious professionalism concerns.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerClear explanationsDisrespect concernsDisorganized lecturesTough gradingLecture heavy
  • Reviews and severe complaints about disrespect and disorganization.
  • Positive students say and visuals.
  • Negative students report , and humiliating behavior.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Getting an A appears difficult because and multiple students dropped or reported high frustration.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

The anatomy , but lecture-heavy pacing, missing materials, and lab time issues make the course feel challenging.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Reviews mention mandatory study groups and flexible.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Recommendation is low because strong praise is outweighed by repeated complaints about disrespect, disorganization, and withdrawals.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students directly call grading tough, and the grade evidence includes withdrawals rather than successful high grades.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

, and poor organization make the workload feel heavier than the course content alone.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Some students praise her explanations, but repeated reports of disrespect, late office hours, and disorganization pull teaching quality down.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention tests, lab time, lectures, and group projects, so assessment appears .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

teaching reviews and four severe complaints about behavior and organization.

Main concern

Students repeatedly describe disrespect, disorganization, late office hours, and mandatory group work.

What students said

“Professor Parisa Roghani really has the ability to help make you understand and great pictures and uses more than one way teach.”
120
“She uses her history of learning challenges as a license to treat her students with disrespect.”
120
“Missed syllabus for the first two weeks of starting.”
120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Tests MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proved

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove the .

Tests MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proved
“Wasted long periods of and left little to no time for lab time.”
120

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She was so bad actually had to write a letter to the school Superintendent about her behavior.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, organization, and classroom treatment. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Split

42/100

“Professor Parisa Roghani really has the ability to help make you understand and great pictures and uses more than one way teach.”

⚠️ Professionalism Risk

34/100

“She uses her history of learning challenges as a license to treat her students with disrespect.”

📚 Organization Issues

30/100

“Missed syllabus for the first two weeks of starting.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , so you understand.
  • Her lectures are not boring.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Classroom Experience

  • It was unbelievably humiliating!
  • Very disrespectful.
  • Very apathetic.

Theme 3

📚 About Structure

  • No textbook. .
  • There is no textbook or .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

, but the split tone and limited course range reduce certainty.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

1206 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1