AI Rate Professor

Behavioral Sciences

Susan Rahman

SOC230 · BEHS103 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want a , and very manageable behavioral sciences course.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringClear gradingHighly recommendedLow-cost materialsManageable workload
  • Students consistently describe Rahman as , and enjoyable.
  • Online work is flexible, weekly, and not overloaded.
  • and complete the work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Getting an A looks very realistic with participation, reading, and completed work, and .

Online evidence is strongest for , while but still required.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The material makes students think but is presented clearly and without overload.

Online reviews stress flexible, reflective work, while and discussion-based classes.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

80/100

but students say missing class is not a major issue, and online work is flexible.

Online reviews show deadline flexibility, while but is not strict.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Every review is highly positive and , and engaging.

Both online and slightly more focused on flexibility.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Students report , and success when assignments and participation are completed.

Format shift

Online comments explicitly mention easy grading, while .

Workload

Light

84/100

The workload is steady but not heavy, with weekly online tasks and .

Format shift

Online reviews describe low overload and flexible timing, while as papers, midterms, and a final.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students consistently describe Rahman as , and enjoyable to learn from.

Format shift

Both formats show excellent teaching, with online comments emphasizing warmth and feedback and in-person comments emphasizing comprehension and passion.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears to mix , and a final.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly assignments, discussions, and tests, while , and a final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe clear , and reasonable exams or papers.

Main concern

Students still need to read, attend when possible, and .

What students said

“while if you can't show up.”
BEHS103
“You do have to complete the work, midterms and final.”
SOC230

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews praise her caring style, flexible weekly deadlines, free materials, and .

Main concern

Discussion posts and active participation matter.

What students said

“The assignments are due on Sunday every week, so you .”
BEHS103
“You're not overloaded with assignments/reading.”
BEHS103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests, midterms, and a final, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or .

Tests MentionedMidterms MentionedFinal MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a final but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Midterms MentionedFinal MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“You do have to complete the work, midterms and final.”
SOC230

Online

Online reviews mention tests but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

Tests MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“I've only gotten less than 90% on one test.”
BEHS103

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the and people I have got the joy of knowing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“She is very passionate about her classes and really knows how to teach students in a way that is easy to comprehend.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“ !”

⚖️

90/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Susan Rahman is incredibly sweet and caring.
  • She is very passionate about her classes and really knows how to teach students in a way that is easy to comprehend.
  • Human Sexuality is an interesting topic and Susan makes it fun to learn.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You're not overloaded with assignments/reading.
  • The hardest part of the class was the partner paper, but we had a lot of time to complete it and we got an A.
  • The assignments are due on Sunday every week, so you .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Six detailed and highly consistent reviews across online and .

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

BEHS1034 reviews
SOC2302 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values