Is this an easy A?
FairEffort
74/100An A is realistic with , and using help, but several comments warn that effort is still required.
Online evidence is too thin, while but real work.
CIS215 · CIS126 · CIS137 · CIS110 · CIS172 · COMP215 · CIS116 · CIS127 · CIS118 · CIS237 · 17 lifetime ratings
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
An A is realistic with x x, and using help, but several comments warn that effort is still required.
Online evidence is too thin, while x x x x x x x x but real work.
Is the course easy?
Ritchie makes difficult programming topics clearer, but the content itself can still be hard for non-technical students.
The one online review gives no difficulty detail, while x x x x x x x x understandable.
Is attendance flexible?
Reviews x x x x x x, though students say he is approachable and generous with deadlines.
x x x x x x, so flexibility is not strongly proven.
Is this professor recommended?
Students overwhelmingly recommend him because x x x x x, and makes programming easier to learn.
The online review is positive but sparse, while in-person reviews provide strong recommendation evidence over many years.
Course guide
Grading
Lenient
78/100
Open-book tests, mistake fixes, and x x x x, though one student reported harsh-feeling results.
Format shift
x x x x x x, while online evidence gives no grading detail.
Workload
Moderate
62/100
Homework and programming practice require effort, but students describe the assignments as practical and doable.
Format shift
In-person reviews describe meaningful but manageable work, while online workload evidence is not detailed.
Teaching experience
Excellent
92/100
Most students describe him as x x x x, and able to explain difficult programming topics.
Format shift
In-person evidence is rich and strongly positive, while the single online review is positive but brief.
Assessment method
Balanced
60/100
Grades appear x x x x x x, and open-book tests rather than exams alone.
Format shift
x x x x x, and tests, while the online review does not specify assessment methods.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward
x x x x x as helpful, knowledgeable, fair, and good at making programming understandable.
Main concern
Some students still find the programming workload and x x if they struggle with the material.
What students said
“Programming can be a dull, difficult subject to learn, but he made it easy to understand.”
“I work hard for this class even at struggling times but I what I get an F”
Remote format
Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly
The single online review is very positive but gives little detail beyond enjoyment and professor quality.
Main concern
There is too little online evidence to judge workload or x x x.
What students said
“I really enjoy this class, great professor”
Exam style
In-person reviews repeatedly describe open-book or notes-allowed tests, making exams student-friendly despite the need to study.
Assessment risk
StudentFriendly
86/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
x x x x as open-book or allowing textbook and notes, but students still need to study.
“Easy going, easy exams, allows usage of textbook and x x x.”
“x x x x.”
“x x x x, but since it can be a difficult subject you still must study to do well.”
The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.
Student evidence
Top student voice
“Ritchie makes a x x x.”
“Dr. Ritchie is an excellent teacher.”
“Honest. Intelligent. Clear. Fair. Gentle. Fun. If you want to learn, you are in very good hands.”
“Easy going, easy exams, allows usage of textbook and x x x.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
17
Recent reviews read by the AI
17
Lifetime ratings
90/100
Evidence confidence
Seventeen reviews over a long span are detailed and mostly consistent, though many are older.
Inside 17 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
3 reported outcomes
A 2
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
F 1
No reported values