AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Manny Kang

CIS215 · CIS275 · CS110 · MATH115 · CSI110 · CIS160 · MATH63 · STAT115 · STATS115 · CIS110 · CIS120 · 54 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
98.15%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you want a and rewards steady effort.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring and supportiveClear lecturesAccessible outside classHighly recommendedOrganized teaching
  • Students overwhelmingly describe Manny Kang as , and clear.
  • Grades appear very reachable when students complete the work, though some courses include lots of .
  • Online reviews are also mostly positive, but one online review reports poor communication and late assignments.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

A grades are common and students say , and support make strong grades very reachable with steady work.

Both formats support a high grade path, while and attendance still matter.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Students say he makes difficult technical or statistics material understandable, though and homework.

Online and in-person comments both praise clarity, with in-person reviews adding more detail about .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Some reviews mention participation and one says attendance is needed, but the .

; online reviews do not clearly prove attendance rules.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students repeatedly say they highly recommend him because , and committed to student success.

, though online has one notable negative outlier about responsiveness.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

84/100

, and fairness, with many reported A-range grades.

Format shift

Both formats support lenient or reviews.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

The workload is usually manageable but several students mention lots of .

Format shift

Online has one lots-of-homework review, while but .

Teaching experience

Excellent

97/100

Students overwhelmingly describe him as , and highly available.

Format shift

Both formats are highly positive, though online includes one negative outlier about organization and email response.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Comments mention , and assignments more often than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide most assessment detail, while online reviews mention coursework and assignments but .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are strongly positive, emphasizing clear explanations, caring support, flexibility, and approachable teaching.

Main concern

Some in-person courses require attendance, homework, reading, or participation to keep up.

What students said

“The class in general is very easy going and as .”
CIS110
“ ---though doable.”
MATH115

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online students mostly praise his support, organization, real-world examples, and flexibility, with one serious complaint about responsiveness and late assignments.

Main concern

A small minority reports weak online management and slow communication.

What students said

“ and through concrete real-life examples makes them understandable.”
CIS275
“ not respond to emails.”
CIS120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews suggest tests can be straightforward when taught in class, but and .

Straightforward TestsQuizzes MentionedHomework-Based EvidenceNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and passing tests and quizzes, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Straightforward TestsTests And Quizzes Mentioned
“ and straight to the context he teaches in class!”
CIS110
“Manny made a very difficult subject tolerable. He worked with students to insure we passed tests and .”
MATH115

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Manny was willing to go above and beyond for any student.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

97/100

“ and through concrete real-life examples makes them understandable.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“I would highly recommend taking any CIS classes with Professor Manny!”

⚖️

84/100

“ and .”

📚 Workload Balance

60/100

“ ---though doable.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and listen to student feedback
  • and very good manner.
  • Lectures were well thought out and informative.

Theme 2

❤️ About Support

  • He really wants you to succeed
  • Manny was willing to go above and beyond for any student.
  • and outside of class.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class in general is very easy going and as .
  • and .
  • ---though doable.

Theme 4

💻 About Online Experience

  • Professor was very willing to help his students succeed academically and professional.
  • not respond to emails.
  • It really became a hybrid class due to the current worldwide situation, but he was still able to help regardless and was still great.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

54

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across several years and courses show highly consistent praise with only a few workload and online-management concerns.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 550
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CIS11017 reviews
CIS2759 reviews
CIS1607 reviews
CIS1206 reviews
CIS2153 reviews
Show 6 more courses
MATH1153 reviews
CS1101 review
CSI1101 review
MATH631 review
STAT1151 review
STATS1151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

36 reported outcomes

A range

28

A+ 4 · A 19 · A- 5

B range

3

B+ 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 4