AI Rate Professor

Economics

Cheryl Mortimer

ECON102 · MICROECON · ECON101 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if , though the class may still be grade-manageable for independent students.

Best fit · Easy A HunterDisorganizedPolitical tangentsError-prone testsEasy gradingMixed lecture quality
  • Recent reviews strongly criticize disorganization, test errors, political commentary, and poor online course management.
  • Older positive reviews describe her as , and .
  • Grades appear attainable, but students question whether the course is well taught or fairly assessed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Several students report A or A- grades and low difficulty, but flawed tests and .

Online evidence is limited and negative, while .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Economics content is generally not described as hard, but confusing organization and .

The online review stresses confusion from course management, while and lecture quality.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , but and canceled classes suggest inconsistent expectations.

, so flexibility is uncertain.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Recent because of disorganization, political tangents, and unreliable tests.

The online review is clearly negative, and praise.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Grades can be good, but comments about , and flawed tests weaken confidence in fairness.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions tough grading, while unfair test quality.

Workload

Light

72/100

Reviews rarely complain about heavy workload, and difficulty ratings are generally low.

Format shift

Both formats provide little workload detail, with no strong evidence of heavy work.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Her teaching is described as engaging by some older reviews, but recent reviews emphasize disorganization, confusion, and poor assessment design.

Format shift

The only online review is poor, while but trend negative in recent years.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

, and exam review sessions.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions quizzes, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews are split, but recent comments emphasize disorganization, political tangents, and .

Main concern

The main concern is unreliable teaching and assessment quality.

What students said

“Awful teacher. ”
ECON101
“ ”
ECON101
“ and she does an ”
ECON102

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review describes confusing delivery, poor course management, quiz issues, and weak communication.

Main concern

The main concern is disorganization with quizzes, lectures, and communication.

What students said

“she and forgets to post lectures”
ECON101
“It is hard to contact her.”
ECON101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but reviews do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or Lockdown Browser.

QuizzesLecture-Based TestsTest ErrorsReview Before Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and frequent test errors, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Lecture-Based TestsTest ErrorsReview Before Tests
“On the most recent test she had to correct 10 out of the 40 questions”
ECON101
“ and she does an ”
ECON102
“ ”
ECON101

Online

The online review mentions quiz problems but does not clearly prove proctoring, .

Quiz Issues
“she ”
ECON101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you are expecting to learn anything.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, testing, and organization; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Cheryl Is all over the place.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“ .”

📝 Assessment Quality

42/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Awful teacher.
  • Professor was engaging and fun.
  • and gives humorous and relevant examples.

Theme 2

📝 About Tests

  • On the most recent test she had to correct 10 out of the 40 questions
  • and she does an

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Experience

  • It is a headache dealing with her.
  • It is hard to contact her.
  • if you are expecting to learn anything.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

The sample has only 8 reviews, but the recent negative comments are detailed and consistent across online and in-person formats.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ECON1016 reviews
ECON1021 review
MICROECON1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 2 · A- 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1