AI Rate Professor

English

Lucas Drisdell

ENGL120 · EGNL120 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
95/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take him if you want a and fair expectations.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringHelpfulGood FeedbackClass DiscussionsExtra Credit
  • Students describe him as caring, honest, and willing to help.
  • The course centers on reading, discussion, exercises, and essays.
  • Grades seem fair, with mentioned but limited grade evidence.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

and , but the course still requires reading, discussion, exercises, and essays.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The class sounds approachable because students highlight help and feedback, though essay work and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not prove a .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students recommend him because , and .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

is mentioned and students describe fair support, but there is not enough .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Workload includes reading, discussions, exercises, and essays, but no review describes it as overwhelming.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Students consistently describe him as caring, helpful, honest, and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews emphasize class discussions, exercises, and essay assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are strongly positive and , and discussion-based writing preparation.

Main concern

Students should expect reading, discussions, exercises, and .

What students said

“he actually does care how you do and corrects you if youre wrong or need more work”
EGNL120
“great instructor and is always willing to help students out”
ENGL120
“plenty of class discussions and ”
EGNL120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the open-book or closed-book.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Format

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Format

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and sweet, I really liked having him for Summer Bridge and and he actually does care how you do and corrects you if youre wrong or need more work, which is always good.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, and coursework. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“he actually does care how you do and corrects you if youre wrong or need more work”

👍 Recommendation Strength

92/100

“I loved having him and his taste in music he always puts before class.”

📝 Course Work

62/100

“plenty of class discussions and ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and sweet
  • great instructor and is always willing to help students out
  • great teacher

Theme 2

📝

  • Get ready to read
  • plenty of class discussions and

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • he actually does care how you do
  • Hes honest which is a good character of him

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews over a long time span are mostly consistent and positive, but several comments are brief and grade evidence is limited.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

EGNL1202 reviews
ENGL1202 reviews

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values