AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jane Sherman

MATH101 · MATH103 · MATH95 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want a strong teacher and are ready to work consistently.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGreat explanationsHeavy homeworkOffice hours matterHard testsClear grading
  • Most students strongly praise her teaching and .
  • The class requires steady work, lots of , and .
  • Students , and use office hours can do well.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is realistic for students who show , and use support, but it is not effortless.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The math content and tests are challenging, but and reviews make the material manageable.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as mandatory, but students repeatedly say showing up is important for success.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most students recommend her because she teaches clearly, cares about success, and rewards steady effort.

The recommendation evidence is entirely in person and mostly positive with one strong negative outlier.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Grading appears fair because effort, homework, reviews, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

, and ability to make math understandable.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is all in person, with one negative review but mostly strong praise.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Assessment seems to combine lots of and final reviews, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but usually rewarding math class with strong teaching and office-hour support.

Main concern

The main concern is heavy workload and .

What students said

“Jane is brilliant and .”
MATH103
“Show up to class, do the homework, and you'll get an A.”
MATH101
“Don't expect an easy A.”
MATH101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and , but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring policies.

Hard TestsLong TestsMidterm ReviewsFinal ReviewsPossible Curve

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

midterms and finals, and possible curves when the class struggles.

Hard TestsLong TestsMidterm ReviewsFinal ReviewsPossible Curve
“The and horrible and there is a ton of homework.”
MATH103
“She has reviews for midterms and finals and will grade on a curve if the .”
MATH101
“doing the work did seem to correlate to a .”
MATH101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Jane values hard work; if .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“Jane is brilliant and .”

📚 Workload

25/100

“there is a ton of homework.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

82/100

“That .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Jane wants you to succeed.
  • She has methods of looking at math that I haven't seen before from other instructors.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Don't expect an easy A.
  • Show up to class, do the homework, and you'll get an A.
  • Put in the work studying and it isn't difficult.

Theme 3

📝

  • The and horrible and there is a ton of homework.
  • She is a firm believer in repetition, so lots of homework and weekly quizzes.
  • She has reviews for midterms and finals.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

65/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because only 5 in-person reviews are available, though the main positive and workload themes are consistent.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1013 reviews
MATH1031 review
MATH951 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1