AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Sara Lefkowitz

NURS214 · NURSNE95 · ORTHONUERO · NURS280 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

She is a strong choice for nursing students who , and useful class time.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear LecturesFair TestsOrganized CourseCaring InstructorUseful Class Time
  • Students describe her as , and strong in both lecture and clinical settings.
  • Tests are described as fair and based on lecture content.
  • One review notes an unpredictable style and discomfort with questions, but the overall tone is highly positive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

The course can be manageable because and tests reflect lectures, though nursing content still requires study.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Students say the material is clearly presented and .

, so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

In-person reviews describe class style but not a .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and dedicated.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

as fair and reasonable, with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

76/100

and manageable classes, though nursing exams still require preparation.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students praise her organization, clarity, dedication, and ability to keep class useful and interesting.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

The clearest assessment evidence points to multiple-choice tests based on lecture material.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are highly positive, emphasizing clear presentation, organization, and fair testing.

Main concern

One student disliked her unpredictable classroom style and being called on.

What students said

“ and reflect what she covers in lecture.”
NURS280
“the and interesting.”
NURSNE95
“teacher a little unpredictable - ”
NURS214

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear fair and lecture-based, but reviews .

Multiple Choice TestsLecture-Based TestsReviews do not clearly prove proctoring or book policy

Assessment risk

Standard

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews explicitly describe multiple-choice tests that reflect lecture content, with .

Multiple Choice TestsLecture-Based Tests
“ and reflect what she covers in lecture.”
NURS280

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and reflect what she covers in lecture.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, testing, and classroom fit. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“she also presents new and creative ideas and works hard to keep her class time useful and interesting!!!”

👍 Recommendation Rate

92/100

“Hope to have her as an instructor again.”

⚖️ Testing Fairness

70/100

“She is fair and reasonable.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • class was easy and material was clearly presented.
  • She's great--the and interesting.
  • she also presents new and creative ideas and works hard to keep her class time useful and interesting!!!

Theme 2

📋

  • She is fair and reasonable.
  • and reflect what she covers in lecture.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Fit

  • teacher doesn't like you to ask questions
  • teacher a little unpredictable -

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are detailed enough and mostly consistent.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NURS2141 review
NURS2801 review
NURSNE951 review
ORTHONUERO1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values