AI Rate Professor

English

Mary Fitzpatrick

ENG98 · ENG98SL · ENGL120 · ENGL098 · ENGLISH · ESL86 · ESL98 · ENG120 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you value a and can tolerate a polarizing teaching style.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing teacherBoring classesOrganized and patientHarsh student experiencesHelpful for some students
  • Reviews are sharply divided between students who found her patient and students who strongly regretted taking her.
  • Several negative reviews describe the class as boring, weak, or damaging to confidence.
  • Positive , and capable of improving English skills.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

An A is possible, but reviews include failure, stress, and inconsistent .

All grade and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content does not sound intellectually extreme, but the class experience feels difficult for many students because of boredom and frustration.

Only in-person reviews describe course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

No online reviews exist, and in-person comments .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recommendation is low because multiple students strongly warn others away despite several positive experiences.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

One student reports failing and later earning a B+ elsewhere, while grade evidence is too thin to show leniency.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reviews focus more on teaching quality and boredom than on a clearly heavy or light workload.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss the class experience.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Teaching quality is polarizing, with some praise for patience but many severe complaints about boredom and weak instruction.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

support to severe dissatisfaction.

Main concern

The biggest concern is repeated complaints that the class is boring and frustrating.

What students said

“ , and very patient with her students.”
ENGL120
“ , money(fees) as well as my self-esteem.”
ENG98SL
“Marry is the worst English class I ever had”
ENG120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Exam Policy Unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book status, or final exam policy.

Exam Policy Unclear

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ different teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“ , and very patient with her students.”

⚠️ Student Risk

35/100

“ , money(fees) as well as my self-esteem.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

35/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Mary is a wonderful teacher.
  • What a boring instructor
  • and she makes the class very interesting.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Negative Experiences

  • This was probably the .
  • Marry is the worst English class I ever had
  • I seriously considered transfering to another community college because of my experience in her class.

Theme 3

📈 About Learning Outcomes

  • I learned a lot from her.
  • she was the one changed my english skill from c to an A!!
  • I failed.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews give a , but many are old and several lack concrete course mechanics.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENGL1202 reviews
ENG1201 review
ENG981 review
ENG98SL1 review
ENGL0981 review
Show 3 more courses
ENGLISH1 review
ESL861 review
ESL981 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values