AI Rate Professor

History

Crystal Cohen

POL212 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
80/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

She looks like a strong choice for students who want an encouraging mentor, but the evidence base is very small.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyInspiring TeacherTransfer SupportHelpful MentorLow Difficulty
  • The only review is very positive and emphasizes personal academic support.
  • The student earned an A- and rated the class low in difficulty.
  • Evidence is limited because there is only one in-person review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

The only student reported an A- with low difficulty, suggesting a manageable grade path but limited proof.

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course appears approachable based on the low difficulty rating, but the comment gives little detail about content challenge.

Course easiness evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The , so flexibility is not clearly proven.

No online or .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

The student strongly values her support, inspiration, and recommendation help.

Recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

The student earned an A- and rated difficulty low, but one review is not enough to prove a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

75/100

The low difficulty rating suggests a light course experience, though workload details are not described.

Format shift

Workload evidence .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

The review credits her with inspiring interest and giving meaningful transfer support.

Format shift

Teaching evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not clearly describe assignments, exams, papers, or .

Format shift

Assessment evidence is not clearly described in the one in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The and helping with transfer applications and recommendations.

Main concern

There is only one review, so the pattern is not well proven.

What students said

“She really sparked my interest in international studies”
POL212
“she was more than willing to help me with my transfer applications and recommendations”
POL212

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, midterm, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

No Clear Exam Evidence

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She really sparked my interest in international studies”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in inspiration and mentorship. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“She really sparked my interest in international studies”

❤️ Student Support

90/100

“she was more than willing to help me with my transfer applications and recommendations”

📈 Grade Experience

80/100

“I believe her recommendation greatly helped in my evaluation.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Impact

  • She really sparked my interest in international studies
  • I only had her for one semester

Theme 2

❤️ About Mentorship

  • she was more than willing to help me with my transfer applications and recommendations
  • I believe her recommendation greatly helped in my evaluation.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, so the positive pattern is promising but weakly supported.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

POL2121 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values