AI Rate Professor

Biology

Paul Silva

BIOL247 · BIO110 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
27/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.7

The decision

Avoid Paul Silva unless you can teach yourself difficult biology material and prepare for .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesBrutal TestsDisorganized Textbook AlignmentHard ClassNice but Ineffective
  • Students often describe Paul Silva as a nice person but a weak or .
  • The course content and difficulty number suggests.
  • All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A looks difficult because students report , and limited useful guidance.

, and they strongly suggest high effort for grades.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

26/100

The biology content feels challenging because , and studying outside class is difficult.

, and they consistently describe the course as .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe .

Only in-person reviews are available, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Students warn against taking him because teaching is confusing and .

, and the recommendation tone is mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

26/100

A reported C+ plus comments about brutal tests and .

Format shift

and test difficulty.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

The workload pressure comes from difficult independent studying and .

Format shift

, and they emphasize hard study demands.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Students say he is nice, but they repeatedly criticize , weak organization, and poor instructional value.

Format shift

, and they are mostly negative about teaching.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

86/100

, and misleading study guides, with no assignment-centered evidence.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews are available, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person students describe , weak textbook alignment, misleading study guides, and .

Main concern

You may need to learn much of the .

What students said

“I learn more by studying before tests than I do by listening to him talk.”
BIO110
“Study guides were misleading, and .”
80379
“His classes are very hard but he is a -”
BIOL247

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Students explicitly describe tests as brutal and study guides as misleading, but .

Brutal TestsMisleading Study Guides

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as brutal and study guides as misleading, but do not prove proctoring, book policy, or .

Brutal TestsMisleading Study Guides
“ .”
BIO110
“Study guides were misleading, and .”
80379

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, exams, and organization. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“He's a nice guy, but he certainly is not a good teacher.”

⚠️

25/100

“ .”

📉 Recommendation Risk

24/100

“If .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Class lectures were mostly understandable, but when it came to studying outside of school it was very difficult.
  • He's a nice guy, but he certainly is not a good teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Exams

  • .
  • Study guides were misleading, and .
  • His classes are very hard but he is a -

Theme 3

📚 About Organization

  • He doesn't teach out of the book
  • he taught chapters in a random order making it very difficult to follow along.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

, but their complaints about difficulty and confusing teaching are consistent.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

803791 review
BIO1101 review
BIOL2471 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values