AI Rate Professor

Political Science

H Farnelay

POLS100 · POLISCI100 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you are , and handle a demanding class.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerKnowledgeableEnthusiastic LecturerHard ClassMixed HelpfulnessAttendance Matters
  • One student praises his subject knowledge, enthusiasm, and storytelling.
  • Another student describes him as hard and unwilling to help.
  • The , and serious studying.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Getting an A , and strong lecture notes rather than minimal effort.

All evidence comes from two in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course is described as not easy and dependent on careful note-taking and studying.

Only in-person reviews describe course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

One review says success requires attending class, and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

He may work for students who value knowledgeable lectures, but support and difficulty are serious concerns.

Recommendation evidence is mixed and entirely in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

, but the class is described as hard and effort-heavy.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students report , and good lecture notes to keep up.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Teaching feedback is split between enthusiastic, knowledgeable storytelling and a complaint about poor help.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention attendance, studying, and lecture notes but as dominant.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention class expectations.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and poor support, with both suggesting the class is demanding.

Main concern

Helpfulness and approachability are inconsistent across reviews.

What students said

“He teaches the class enthusiastically.”
POLISCI100
“the class was not easy.”
POLISCI100
“Hard teacher, didnt want to help at all”
POLS100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or testing format.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“the class was not easy. it requires attending the class, studying hard, & taking a good lecture notes.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and support; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Dr Fearnley knows his subject very well.”

📈 Difficulty and Effort

38/100

“the class was not easy.”

⚠️ Student Support

48/100

“Hard teacher, didnt want to help at all”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He teaches the class enthusiastically.
  • An excellent story teller about the subject.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Effort

  • the class was not easy.
  • it requires attending the class, studying hard, & taking a good lecture notes.

Theme 3

❤️ About Helpfulness

  • .
  • Hard teacher, didnt want to help at all

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and they conflict on support and overall experience.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

POLISCI1001 review
POLS1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values