AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Michael Brailoff

205RESRCHMETH · SOC112 · PSYCH110 · PSYCHE110 · PSY · PSY205 · PSYCH204 · PSY114 · PSYCHOLOGY · SOC101 · SOC110 · PSY110 · SOCPSY205 · SOCIALPSYCH · SOC230 · SOCPSYCHETC · PSY204 · 40 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you can handle lecture tangents and want a knowledgeable professor with .

Best fit · Effort For RewardKnowledgeable but polarizingTake-home testsInteresting lecturesLecture-test mismatchEssay rewrites
  • Students often praise his knowledge, stories, and real-world examples.
  • , but some students say lectures and .
  • The experience varies sharply by course and student preference, especially for students who dislike long tangents.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Getting an A looks realistic because and rewrites are allowed, though essays and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The course content is usually manageable, but , and disconnected lectures make some sections harder.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

and understanding lectures, but several students report skipping class and still passing.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

and engaging stories, but repeated complaints about organization and test alignment limit enthusiasm.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

, and straightforward assignments make grading fairly forgiving despite some unclear prompts.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload is manageable for many students, but , and note-taking can add up.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

73/100

He is often described as brilliant and interesting, but some students find him boring, arrogant, or .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and reading-based work rather than relying only on one format.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a knowledgeable, sometimes fascinating professor whose grading can be manageable but whose lectures .

Main concern

Some students say and reading.

What students said

“ and straight out of the book.”
PSYCH110
“the lectures were boring and never related to the tests.”
PSY204
“Awesome teacher. allowed).”
SOC110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews repeatedly describe take-home or and finals.

Take-Home TestsOpen Book TestsEssay RewritesMidterm and Final Reuse Questions

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and open-book testing, but do not clearly prove proctoring rules.

Take-Home TestsOpen Book TestsEssay Rewrites
“Three test with 200+ questions, open book, 3 weeks to do it.”
SOC110
“ ”
SOC110
“ , but the ”
SOC110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 40 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

73/100

“He's brilliant and and fascinating.”

📝

84/100

“ and straight out of the book.”

⚖️

76/100

“Awesome teacher. allowed).”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very interesting lectures.
  • He is a brilliant teacher and extremely knowledgeable on any topic regarding soc or psych.
  • the lectures were boring and never related to the tests.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • in the text.
  • I spent 6+ hours a week studying.
  • , but the

Theme 3

🧭 About Course Fit

  • If you REALLY like the topic you may like this class. MAYBE
  • You'll only get as much as you put into it, but there is much to be gained
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

40

Recent reviews read by the AI

40

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 40 in-person reviews span many years and show consistent themes despite mixed opinions.

Inside 40 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 510
3 out of 512
2 out of 54
1 out of 52

Course coverage

SOC11010 reviews
PSYCH2045 reviews
PSYCH1104 reviews
PSY1103 reviews
SOC2303 reviews
Show 13 more courses
PSY2042 reviews
SOC1012 reviews
101 review
205RESRCHMETH1 review
PSY1 review
PSY1141 review
PSY2051 review
PSYCHE1101 review
PSYCHOLOGY1 review
SOC1121 review
SOCIALPSYCH1 review
SOCPSY2051 review
SOCPSYCHETC1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values