AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Yolanda Van Ecke

PSYC110 · PSYCH114DEVEL · PSYCH110 · PSY114 · HUMANDEVELP · PSYCH114 · PSYCH101 · PSY110 · PSY116 · PSYCHLIFESPAN · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
73/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want an engaging psychology instructor and can handle steady weekly work, but be cautious with the online-style workload described in comments.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging lecturesHeavy online workloadWeekly quizzesStrict APA gradingConfusing online format
  • Students often praise her in-person teaching as , and personally meaningful.
  • The course can require , and papers.
  • Several comments criticize the online format as , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is reachable, but students , and serious preparation as the real cost.

All , though several comments discuss an online-style class experience.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The subject is understandable with reading and preparation, but some students found the nuances hard to grasp.

All counted evidence is from in-person reviews, with mixed comments .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

One review says weekly discussions function as attendance, but there is .

All , and no online review count exists.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

and helpful teaching, but online-format confusion and workload reduce confidence.

All counted evidence is from in-person reviews, with positive in-person teaching comments and negative online-format comments inside that set.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

but not easy, with and tests that require preparation.

Format shift

All grading evidence comes from in-person reviews, including comments about hard APA grading and doable tests.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Multiple , and papers, making the workload heavy for an introductory psychology class.

Format shift

All , though several describe online-style coursework.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Students often describe her as , and insightful despite format and organization complaints.

Format shift

All teaching evidence comes from in-person reviews, with strong praise for lectures and .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears split across weekly quizzes or tests, discussions, reading, and papers.

Format shift

All assessment evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no separately counted online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but lean positive, with strong praise for lectures and repeated concern about workload and online-format confusion.

Main concern

, and strict APA expectations can make the class more work than expected.

What students said

“It was more work than I thought it would be-- thorough weekly quizzes(50 questions), , but I was forced to read the book, and I ended up learning a lot.”
PSY116
“Super friendly. if .”
PSYCH114
“ , but doable.”
PSYCHLIFESPAN

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and a , but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Weekly QuizzesWeekly TestsFinal Repeats QuizzesSerious Preparation Required

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final based on quizzes, but do not clearly prove proctoring or book policy.

Weekly QuizzesWeekly TestsFinal Repeats Quizzes
“thorough weekly quizzes(50 questions), ”
PSY116
“There is a , and pay attention to them because the .”
PSY110
“ , but doable.”
PSYCHLIFESPAN

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I got an A but it was a lot of work & effort.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“Van Ecke gave very good lectures, though they would get off topic sometimes, but it was always interesting.”

📈 Grade Effort

62/100

“I got an A but it was a lot of work & effort.”

⚖️ Workload Balance

32/100

“It was more work than I thought it would be-- thorough weekly quizzes(50 questions), , but I was forced to read the book, and I ended up learning a lot.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

76/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Van Ecke gave very good lectures, though they would get off topic sometimes, but it was always interesting.
  • her class is really interesting and
  • and

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • I got an A but it was a lot of work & effort.
  • It was more work than I thought it would be-- thorough weekly quizzes(50 questions),
  • , but doable.

Theme 3

💻 About Format Issues

  • .
  • if .
  • the and very unsatisfying.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are 12 reviews with consistent themes, but they are old and some format wording conflicts with the authoritative in-person count.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PSY1142 reviews
PSYCH1142 reviews
HUMANDEVELP1 review
PSY1101 review
PSY1161 review
Show 5 more courses
PSYC1101 review
PSYCH1011 review
PSYCH1101 review
PSYCH114DEVEL1 review
PSYCHLIFESPAN1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values