AI Rate Professor

Counseling

Robert Flynn

COUN133 · COUNS101 · COUN101 · COUNS000 · COUN130 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want personal encouragement, but verify transfer and major requirements elsewhere.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring AdvisorMixed HelpfulnessWarm PresentationScattered Explanations
  • Students are split between strong personal support and poor advising accuracy.
  • Positive reviews emphasize warmth, follow-up, and life guidance.
  • Negative reviews cite outdated transfer knowledge, apathy, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

60/100

Grades are not discussed, but low difficulty ratings and helpful counseling-style courses suggest moderate effort rather than a .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course experience seems accessible and supportive, though slow or .

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

Many students value his care and follow-up, but serious complaints about advising accuracy keep the recommendation moderate.

Recommendation and is notably mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

, so leniency cannot be strongly confirmed.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, with .

Workload

Light

72/100

Low difficulty ratings and counseling-focused comments suggest a lighter workload, though assignments are not described.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

68/100

He is often described as warm and helpful, but some students found him apathetic, outdated, or scattered.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

but inconsistent counselor whose personal support is stronger than his technical advising.

Main concern

Some students found him outdated, slow, or unhelpful with requirements.

What students said

“ and he really care.”
COUN133
“He was not updated about any of the requirements of the university about transfer”
COUN101
“Robert, despite being slow in explanation and .”
COUNS000

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, or final structure.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Robert, despite being slow in explanation and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in support, advising accuracy, and consistency; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“Robert is genuinely interested in his students.”

👍 Recommendation Value

64/100

“Without him, I don't know where I'd be.”

⚠️ Advising Risk

45/100

“He was not updated about any of the requirements of the university about transfer”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Support Style

  • and he really care.
  • Robert is genuinely interested in his students.
  • He has a wonderfully warm presentation style.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Weak Spots

  • He was not updated about any of the requirements of the university about transfer
  • He is apathetic, slow, impersonable, insensitive.
  • Robert, despite being slow in explanation and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Six older reviews provide useful but mixed detail, with no recent confirmation.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COUN1332 reviews
COUN1011 review
COUN1301 review
COUNS0001 review
COUNS1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values