Trevor Keiber

MATH15 · MATH10 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 86/100
RMP rating: 3.9/5
Take again: 70%
Difficulty: 2.9

The decision

if you can attend regularly and , but avoid if you need traditional lectures without AI dependence.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra CreditLenient DeadlinesAttendance MattersLots of HomeworkMixed Lecture Clarity

Grades are very forgiving because and flexible deadlines appear often.
Most positive reviews say showing up and doing the work leads to an A.
Recent negative reviews raise concerns about AI-heavy instruction and poor accessibility.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

An A , and flexible deadlines, though workload can pile up.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The content is usually manageable with class attendance, but statistics can become confusing when lectures are missed or unclear.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person MATH10 and MATH15 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

WorthIt

76/100

and , but recent AI-centered complaints reduce confidence.

Recommendation evidence is only in person, with strong older praise and two recent negative MATH15 reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

, flexible due dates, and comments about easy A .

Format shift

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Students mention lots of homework and papers, but the work is often offset by in-class help and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload, with .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Many students call him helpful and caring, but .

Format shift

several reviews and recent sharp criticism.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Reviews emphasize homework, papers, class participation, group work, and .

Format shift

Assessment evidence appears only in in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

with attendance-dependent success and some recent AI-related complaints.

Main concern

Some students found lectures or overly dependent on AI tools.

What students said

“Come to class, get an A.”
MATH15

“He , so it's hard to get a bad grade unless you get overwhelmed by a lot of work.”
MATH15

“I felt like I had to time.”
MATH15

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but one review says he gave answers to half of the midterm and many mention .

Midterm Answers SharedExtra CreditNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but one student describes unusually lenient midterm help.

Midterm Answers SharedExtra Credit

“He once gave answers to half of the midterm.”
MATH15

“He ”
MATH15

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“He , so it's hard to get a bad grade unless you get overwhelmed by a lot of work.”
Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and AI concerns. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Trevor is the .”

📈 Easy A Potential

88/100

“Come to class, get an A.”

⚖️

90/100

“He's also super lenient on due dates and offers plenty of .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

Trevor is hilarious.
I felt like I had to time.
I'm really bad at Math but after taking this math class I understood mostly everything.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Work

Come to class, get an A.
He , so it's hard to get a bad grade unless you get overwhelmed by a lot of work.
deadlines and and gives out for difficult problems.

Theme 3

⚠️ About AI and Accessibility

Required us to pay for the (very expensive!) Google Gemini AI subscription.
The , as we had not had any proper lectures on how to-do things.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Ten recent in-person reviews give detailed and , and teaching style.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56

4 out of 51

3 out of 51

2 out of 50

1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH158 reviews

MATH102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 2 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1

Trevor Keiber

x x if you can attend regularly and x x x, but avoid if you need traditional lectures without AI dependence.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

EasyA

Beginner

Recommended

WorthIt

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

📈 Easy A Potential

⚖️ x x

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Grades and Work

⚠️ About AI and Accessibility

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

if you can attend regularly and , but avoid if you need traditional lectures without AI dependence.

⚖️