AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Marnie Atkins

NAS1 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

unless , and largely self-directed learning.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh gradingPoor structureSlow feedbackHeavy readingFew high-stakes assignments
  • Most students report , and .
  • Grades can still be high, but and .
  • , but it is outweighed by repeated negative experiences.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

Several students earned A grades, but comments describe , and major time demands.

Online evidence emphasizes delayed or , while and large assignments.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course feels difficult mainly because of , and time-consuming papers.

, while in-person students focus on poor structure, rambling class time, and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though in-person class time is often described as low-value or unfocused.

In-person comments criticize class time quality, while online comments .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

because it is poorly structured, harshly graded, and .

Both online and in-person review strongly recommending her.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly call grading harsh, slow, and .

Format shift

Online reviews stress delayed grades and , while and high-stakes assignments.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students report up to 50 pages of reading between classes and .

Format shift

In-person reviews provide the clearest workload evidence, while online .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Most comments describe , and students needing to teach themselves.

Format shift

Online teaching is criticized for communication and grading delays, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Grades appear , and a final rather than frequent balanced assessments.

Format shift

Both formats describe few assignments, with online comments explicitly mentioning the midterm and final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative about poor structure, rambling class , and .

Main concern

Students may need to teach themselves because lectures and as unstructured.

What students said

“I basically taught myself”
NAS1
“the class has little to no structure”
NAS1

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, focusing on ungraded or , and poor communication.

Main concern

Assignments and major assessments may be returned extremely late or not graded clearly.

What students said

“Most of return with a grade”
NAS1
“This professor didn't grade several assignments, including the midterm and final.”
NAS1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The clearest and few high-stakes graded items rather than traditional proctored exams.

Take-Home MidtermFinal PaperFew High-Stakes Assignments

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final paper, with few high-stakes assignments.

Take-Home MidtermFinal PaperFew High-Stakes Assignments
“The midterm takes 50+ at home hours”
NAS1
“The Midterm and .”
NAS1

Online

Online reviews mention a midterm and final but do not .

MidtermFinalFew Assignments
“This professor didn't grade several assignments, including the midterm and final.”
NAS1
“There were 6 assignments for the entire semester”
NAS1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Felt like she couldn't put together a lesson plan for the life of her, showed up to class unprepared,I basically taught myself, absolutely no depth to her teaching.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“I basically taught myself”

⚖️

18/100

“ and .”

⏳

18/100

“Most of return with a grade”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • the class has little to no structure
  • Lectures feel like they often times go nowhere.
  • showed up to class unprepared

Theme 2

⚖️ About Grades And Feedback

  • HARSHLY graded with .
  • and .
  • and very little.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • This professor assigns up to 50 pages of .
  • The midterm takes 50+ at home hours
  • The Midterm and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Seven recent reviews across both formats show highly , and workload.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

NAS17 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 4 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1