AI Rate Professor

English

Robyn Roberson

ENGLISH150 · ENG1A · E6823 · ENGLISH1A · ENGL100 · ENGL150 · EONEAE014 · ENG150 · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
29.41%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if and writing, and prefer in-person support over online ambiguity.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy Writing LoadUnclear InstructionsHarsh GradingHelpful In PersonDisorganized Online
  • Online reviews repeatedly criticize unclear directions, heavy workload, and harsh or .
  • In-person reviews are more balanced, with many students calling her helpful, kind, and willing to support students.
  • The class can improve writing skills, but the workload and organization make the experience risky.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some in-person students say grades are manageable with attendance and revisions, but online and .

, while in-person evidence suggests an A is possible with consistent work and participation.

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

The content is standard English composition, but , and uneven workload raise the difficulty.

Online reviews make the , while but still a lot of work.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance and participation matter in several in-person reviews, but there , and .

, while online reviews focus more on deadlines and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Students recommend her unevenly because kindness and , and harsh grading.

Online students are mostly negative, while workload tolerance.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Many students describe tough or , though revisions and .

Format shift

Online grading is described as harsher and , while and clearer support.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and uneven weekly assignment loads.

Format shift

Both formats have heavy work, but online students describe the workload as more unpredictable and unrealistic.

Teaching experience

Poor

43/100

She is often described as kind and helpful, but and disorganization are recurring problems.

Format shift

Teaching is rated much weaker online, while and better accessibility.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment is mainly , and writing assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats rely heavily on writing assignments, with in-person reviews explicitly mentioning in one course.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and some disorganization, but many also describe her as , and flexible.

Main concern

Students still need to attend, participate, and keep up with steady writing work.

What students said

“She took the time to help everyone in the class”
ENG1A
“ , just 4 papers.”
ENGL150
“You get two skips then it impacts your grade.”
ENGLISH150

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students often describe unclear instructions, uneven workload, harsh grading, and .

Main concern

The biggest risk is doing .

What students said

“ so unclear.”
ENG1A
“the workload was unrealistic.”
ENG1A
“This class is awful, I have never taken a worse class.”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because comments emphasize papers and assignments, with one in-person review explicitly saying there was .

No Final Or MidtermPapersRevision Opportunities

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence says one course had and used papers instead.

No Final Or MidtermFour Papers
“ , just 4 papers.”
ENGL150

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove any webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Nice lady but the workload was unrealistic.”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

43/100

“She was a nice lady, but a terrible online instructor.”

📚 Workload

22/100

“Some weeks were easy and some were like 3 classes worth of work.”

⚖️

32/100

“ as well, she would but then would give me a horrible grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She took the time to help everyone in the class
  • and disorganized.
  • She wants to see you do well.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • she assigns A LOT.
  • the workload was unrealistic.
  • It was difficult. I barely passed.

Theme 3

⚖️

  • She was nit picky with papers
  • She though.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

28

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 28 reviews across many years with enough detail to separate online and in-person patterns.

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 56
3 out of 53
2 out of 56
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENG1A16 reviews
ENGL1504 reviews
ENG1502 reviews
ENGLISH1502 reviews
E68231 review
Show 3 more courses
ENGL1001 review
ENGLISH1A1 review
EONEAE0141 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

4

C 4

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values