AI Rate Professor

Not Specified

Marla Gleaves

KINS65 · PE25E6512 · SOC63 · PE66 · HEALTH03 · HE2 · HEALTWOM · KINS66 · SWIMMING · PE10 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

Take her if you want a and completion usually matter most.

Best fit · Easy A HunterExtremely easyCaring and helpfulParticipation-focusedOrganizedExtra credit
  • Students overwhelmingly describe Marla Gleaves as caring, helpful, and easy to work with.
  • PE and health-related courses are often described as very easy, with participation and completion mattering most.
  • Online and , though one older in-person review criticizes online-class management.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

95/100

A grades are common and students repeatedly call the classes extremely easy, participation-based, and flexible.

Online and in-person evidence adding more detail about participation and extensions.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

93/100

Students describe the content as simple, practical, and sometimes almost painfully easy.

Both formats describe easy content, especially PE10 and activity-based courses.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

72/100

Participation matters in several courses, but , and self-paced activity logging.

Online reviews suggest independent completion, while and instructor flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Students recommend her because the , and supportive.

Both online and in-person-coded complaint as the main exception.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

92/100

A grades, , clear criteria, participation-based grading, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention and clear criteria, while and extensions.

Workload

Featherlight

94/100

Work is , and participation, with several students calling it extremely easy.

Format shift

Online and in-person reviews both describe light workload, though a .

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students , and passionate about student health.

Format shift

Both formats praise her teaching, though one older in-person-coded review criticizes online-class handling.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment appears based mainly , and completion rather than exams.

Format shift

Online and and participation-based assessment.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

classes, participation, helpfulness, and caring support.

Main concern

One older review complains about poor online-class management despite being counted as in person by the supplied data.

What students said

“Super easy class.”
PE10
“Participation is what she mostly cares about.”
PE25E6512
“ .”
HE2

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews are highly positive, , and a caring instructor.

Main concern

One limitation is that .

What students said

“ if you need a unit.”
PE10
“All Professors should be this professional.”
PE10
“The information provided is valuable and based on reputable sources.”
PE10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews rarely discuss exams, so the older test-related health-course comment.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

exam policy, though one health-course review mentions studying notes before a test.

Test From Notes
“If you write down exactly what she writes on the board, and read the notes just before a .”
HEALTWOM

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book exams, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you need a unit.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“Really cares about her job and students.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

95/100

“ ,”

📈 Easy A Signal

95/100

“Super easy class.”

⚖️

92/100

“ .”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Super easy class.
  • if you need a unit.
  • The class was almost painfully easy,

Theme 2

❤️ About Support

  • She is so easy to get along with, she cares about you and ,
  • and willing to help whoever needs it.
  • Was an amazing teacher and super helpful!

Theme 3

🏃 About Participation

  • Each week consists of 3 30 minute outdoor walking/running sessions and a discussion post.
  • Participation is what she mostly cares about.
  • You use the Nike Runkeeper app or just write in your exercise sessions.

Theme 4

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • All Professors should be this professional.
  • She lectures thoroughly and writes everything on the board, and is happy to answer questions.
  • and . Helpful.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen reviews across many years and formats show strong consistency, though several older reviews are brief.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PE107 reviews
KINS652 reviews
SWIMMING2 reviews
HE21 review
HEALTH031 review
Show 5 more courses
HEALTWOM1 review
KINS661 review
PE25E65121 review
PE661 review
SOC631 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 1 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values