AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Austin Roberts

PHIL15 · PHIL10 · ENVSC11 · E7810 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
94.44%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Take him if you want a and strong teaching.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerEngaging LecturesCaring and RespectfulThoughtful DiscussionsClear FeedbackReading Required
  • Students overwhelmingly praise his engaging, respectful, and eye-opening lectures.
  • The workload is usually manageable, but and .
  • Grades are generally accessible, though .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Most students earned A-range grades with manageable work, but reading, participation, and .

The online evidence says keeping up is enough, while reading.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The content is thoughtful and sometimes profound, but students say and keeps lectures engaging.

Both formats describe engaging material, with and environmental courses.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

68/100

as harshly enforced, but , and participation are repeatedly important.

and participation, while the online review only says to keep up with lectures.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Students strongly recommend him because he makes difficult topics engaging, respectful, and personally meaningful.

The online review is positive, and the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Grades are mostly A-range and students mention clear criteria, but .

Format shift

Online evidence supports fair grading, while outlier.

Workload

Light

74/100

Students mention regular reading and discussions, but .

Format shift

Online work requires keeping up, while .

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Reviews repeatedly call his lectures engaging, respectful, caring, and intellectually transformative.

Format shift

Online feedback is positive, and .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Comments mention readings, discussions, assignments, online discussions, lectures, and assessment type.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions reading and lectures, while , tests, and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students consistently describe him as , and intellectually valuable with manageable work.

Main concern

and active discussion.

What students said

“Lectures were great and he really valued student opinion.”
PHIL15
“ .”
ENVSC11
“Doesn't give you a harsh workload, but there is a lot of reading.”
PHIL10

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review describes an enjoyable class with engaging discussions and success tied to keeping up with reading and lectures.

Main concern

You need to stay current with readings and lectures.

What students said

“As long as you keep up with the reading and lectures, you'll do fine.”
PHIL15

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and a final exam dispute, but do not .

Tests Based on Lectures and ReadingFinal Exam MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a final exam, but do not clearly prove the .

Tests Based on Lectures and ReadingFinal Exam Mentioned
“However the and the reading so .”
PHIL10
“ though it was clearly turned in 20 before time.”
PHIL15

Online

The online review does not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This was the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom tone. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Lectures are interactive and very interesting.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

94/100

“The class felt important and eye-opening and .”

📚 Workload Balance

74/100

“Doesn't give you a harsh workload, but there is a lot of reading.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures were great and he really valued student opinion.
  • Lectures are interactive and very interesting.
  • His lectures are super engaging and helpful and taking one of his classes was a great experience.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • .
  • As long as you keep up with the reading and lectures, you'll do fine.
  • There was about 40 pages a week of reading but nothing too bad.

Theme 3

❤️ About Respect and Character

  • and very respectful of others while teaching a subject that can sometimes be controversial.
  • He always makes sure everyone can be heard.
  • Austin is an amazing professor and caring person.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 18 reviews span 2021 to 2026, are detailed, and show very consistent praise with .

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL158 reviews
ENVSC117 reviews
PHIL102 reviews
E78101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 2 · A 9 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1