AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Justine Shaw

HIST4 · CULTURALANTH3 · HIST4E5858 · ANTH5 · ANTH2 · ANTH1 · ANTH3 · ANT3 · ANTH · ARC2 · ANTHR3936 · 46 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Take Justine Shaw if you want a and are ready to write, study, and meet high standards.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderOrganizedPassionate ExpertLecture HeavyWriting Heavy
  • Students often praise her knowledge, organization, and passion for anthropology.
  • The main risk is tough , and detailed requirements.
  • , and keep up with work often report strong learning and good grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

A grades are common, but students , and following detailed expectations.

Online grades can reflect effort with clear instructions, while in-person reviews , and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content is manageable for engaged students but can feel terminology-heavy, writing-heavy, and rigorous.

Online reviews focus on reading and discussion work, while , and lecture-heavy content.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

essential for quizzes, lectures, and grades.

; online reviews do not clearly prove an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

, but tough grading and workload create real hesitation.

Both formats include positive reviews, but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Tough-grader comments , and small requirement misses.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize strict discussion and , while and tough grading.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students , and ongoing study demands.

Format shift

Online workload centers on reading and discussions, while , and attendance-heavy lectures.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

She is widely seen as , and clear, though some students find classes boring or unclear.

Format shift

Online reviews praise structure and communication, while but demanding teaching.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades appear to come from , and attendance.

Format shift

Online reviews mention discussions and tests, while , and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and organized professor whose classes are rewarding but often demanding and attendance-dependent.

Main concern

Students repeatedly , and mandatory attendance.

What students said

“ and so is group participation in weekly discussions.”
ANTH3
“She is a and the .”
ANTH1

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews praise clear structure and knowledge, but and tests.

Main concern

Discussion posts and for small mistakes.

What students said

“ get through this class with a grade that reflects their effort.”
ANTH1
“the tough.”
ANTH1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are often rigorous and writing-heavy, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Pop QuizzesRigorous TestsEssay QuestionsHandwritten Test FormatReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Policy

Assessment risk

Standard

46/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews , and essay questions, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules.

Pop QuizzesRigorous TestsHandwritten Test FormatEssay Questions
“She give usually 3 tests, a final and 5 pop quizzes in this class.”
ANTH1
“ .”
HIST4
“ ”
HIST4E5858

Online

Online reviews mention tests and , but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, open-book status, or .

Test HeavyReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Policy
“She'll give you no credit for coming up with a response to her test that is similar to her .”
ANTH1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you aren't willing to put in time and work don't bother taking her, if you want to learn then she is great.”

Voice snapshots generated from 46 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Passionate, engaging, and knowledgeable.”

⚖️

30/100

“She is a and the .”

📚 Workload And Effort

35/100

“ pile up.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Passionate, engaging, and knowledgeable.
  • Justine is the and knowledgeable teacher I've had so far.
  • She clearly cares about what she teaches and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • but she's great at her job.
  • She is a and the .
  • If you show up to class, follow instructions, and do the work expected, you will get an A.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • 3-4 papers per semester.
  • There are 2 exams, a term paper and 5 pop quizzes.
  • Lots of work, but if and read you'll get a good grade

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

46

Recent reviews read by the AI

46

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

There are 46 reviews across many years and both formats, with rich detail and consistent patterns around teaching quality and .

Inside 46 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 524
4 out of 510
3 out of 57
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ANTH116 reviews
ANTH315 reviews
ANTH25 reviews
ANTH53 reviews
ANT31 review
Show 6 more courses
ANTH1 review
ANTHR39361 review
ARC21 review
CULTURALANTH31 review
HIST41 review
HIST4E58581 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

29 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 1 · A 11 · A- 3

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 2 · B- 3

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

2

D+ 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2