AI Rate Professor

Geography

Madeleine Lopez

FNR77 · FNR32 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
87/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want a challenging but rewarding class that builds real geomatics and forestry skills.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerSupportive mentorChallenging workloadPractical skillsClear and energeticSoftware-heavy learning
  • Students overwhelmingly praise her energy, support, and practical skill-building.
  • The courses can be demanding, especially because of difficult software and long assignments.
  • Most students recommend her if they are willing to put in steady work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

69/100

High grades are common, but , and steady effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

The material and software are difficult, but her organization and support make the challenge manageable.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, but .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

89/100

Students recommend her because , and helps them build useful field skills.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

64/100

Grades are generally strong and there is , but expectations are high and one review calls her a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Most students describe her as , and deeply supportive.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Reviews emphasize labs, assignments, projects, and software work rather than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

as enthusiastic, supportive, and skill-focused, with a demanding workload.

Main concern

Assignments and .

What students said

“She expects a lot of her students, but provides all the foundations and support for them to excel.”
FNR32
“2 hour assignments were really 8 hour assignments”
FNR32

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, midterms, or finals.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I was challenged, but learned so many new skills!”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and practical skills. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“ , and could clearly explain presented material.”

📚 Workload Challenge

28/100

“2 hour assignments were really 8 hour assignments”

👍 Recommendation Rate

89/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The energy Maddie brings to class is truly motivational.
  • , and could clearly explain presented material.
  • Super cool teacher, always stoked to help you learn everyday.

Theme 2

💻 About Skills and Software

  • she makes sure students learn skills that are applicable to either transfer to university or get a job in the field.
  • always offers tons of additional support for navigating some super difficult software.
  • I feel like I've grown so much in her classes, and learned a ton of new skills.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty and Workload

  • She expects a lot of her students, but provides all the foundations and support for them to excel.
  • FNR-31 is HARD and there is lots of material to digest every week.
  • 2 hour assignments were really 8 hour assignments

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed and negative review adding useful contrast.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

FNR326 reviews
FNR771 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values