AI Rate Professor

Social Work

Celia Perez

ADCT10 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Take Celia Perez only if you can tolerate disorganization in exchange for an easy grade and .

Best fit · Easy A HunterDisorganizedCaringEasy GradesMixed FeedbackUnclear Assignments
  • Students all earned A grades, but several reviews criticize organization, clarity, and course structure.
  • Positive comments describe her as , and .
  • , while .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Every reviewed student earned an A and low difficulty ratings suggest the .

Both online and in-person reviews show A outcomes, though and tests.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course does not appear intellectually hard, but and .

Online frustration comes from structure and reflections, while and tests.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation appears in in-person tags, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

Online evidence does not clarify attendance, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Recommendation is split because students appreciate her caring side but criticize organization and clarity.

The online review is clearly not recommended, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

All four students reported A grades despite multiple complaints and low difficulty ratings.

Format shift

Both formats show A grades, but the .

Workload

Light

76/100

Difficulty ratings are low and all grades are A, though reflection expectations and .

Format shift

Online workload concerns focus on reflections, while and test organization.

Teaching experience

Poor

48/100

Her care and feedback help some students, but repeated organization and clarity complaints significantly hurt the teaching experience.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is negative, while review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Reviews emphasize assignments, reflections, and .

Format shift

Online evidence centers on reflections, while and one open-book test.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

review, one strong caring-professor review, and one middle review noting disorganization.

Main concern

Assignments and place.

What students said

“ ”
ADCT10
“ and understanding”
ADCT10
“ but was all over the place”
ADCT10

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review is strongly negative and criticizes structure, organization, and repeated reflection prompts.

Main concern

The online and emotionally demanding in reflections.

What students said

“I was really disappointed with this class and this teacher.”
ADCT10
“It shows in how the class is structured and organized.”
ADCT10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but it also says the test was poorly aligned and all over the place.

Open Book TestUnclear Test Questions

Assessment risk

Varies

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but the questions were poorly aligned with the book.

Open Book TestUnclear Test Questions
“ but was all over the place most questions were not in the book.”
ADCT10

Online

Reviews do not clearly prove the online exam format, proctoring policy, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“ , while teaching.”

⚖️ Grade Ease

86/100

“ but was all over the place most questions were not in the book.”

❤️ Student Support

42/100

“Professor Celia was accessible, empathetic and and school.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , while teaching.
  • Professor Celia was accessible, empathetic and and school.

Theme 2

📚

  • It shows in how the class is structured and organized.
  • she isn't active on the .

Theme 3

📝

  • but was all over the place most questions were not in the book.
  • I was really bothered by how much she expects people to disclose in reflections

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

63/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews include useful details and a , but the sample is small and only one online review exists.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ADCT104 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values