AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Leah King

NUTRITION · NUT1 · NUTRI1 · HO15 · NUTRINUTR · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
30%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you need a light elective, flexible policies, or clear support, especially in the recent online HO15 format.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerOverwhelming homeworkTough gradingNutrition expertiseChaotic assignmentsMixed teaching quality
  • Recent online reviews are strongly negative, citing excessive homework, unclear instructions, strict policies, and poor responsiveness.
  • Older in-person reviews are more mixed, with praise for nutrition knowledge but , and diet studies.
  • The course is not an easy elective and carries real GPA risk for students seeking light work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

31/100

A good grade appears possible, but students repeatedly describe , and heavy workload.

Online evidence is harsher and more recent, while and major diet studies.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Nutrition concepts may be understandable, but the class becomes difficult because , and .

Online reviews emphasize chaotic workload, while and large projects.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

and no late work, but they do not consistently prove a .

Online reviews clearly show strict late-work policies, while in-person reviews say regular attendance helps but .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recent students strongly warn against the class due to , and weak support.

, while in-person reviews are more mixed with some older strong recommendations.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

No late work, tricky tests, major grade-weighted projects, and .

Format shift

Strict grading appears in both formats, with online reviews emphasizing no late work and and diet studies.

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

Many students describe , and major diet studies.

Format shift

Online reviews are especially severe about workload, while and quiz demands.

Teaching experience

Poor

43/100

She is knowledgeable and sometimes praised, but , and chaotic assignments.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is mostly negative and recent, while and more mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

56/100

Grades appear , and a large nutrition or diet project.

Format shift

Online reviews stress assignments and discussion work, while , and the diet study.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, praising her knowledge and lectures while , and .

Main concern

Tests and and feel harsh.

What students said

“ ”
HO15
“Does not except late work, even if you actually have a good reason.”
NUTRI1
“Great teacher. great lectures. some of the quizes were hard”
NUTRITION

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, with recent students describing overwhelming homework, unclear assignments, strict no-late-work policies, and weak support.

Main concern

The workload can be intense and .

What students said

“So responds to messages.”
HO15
“ so chaotic that you don't end up learning anything because there's just so much to do.”
HO15
“ and the assignments and .”
HO15

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, tests, and a final, but do not clearly prove open-book, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring policies.

QuizzesHard TestsFinalTricky Test Questions

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, but do not clearly prove whether exams are open-book or closed-book.

Hard TestsTricky Test QuestionsQuizzesFinal
“ ”
HO15
“ and nutrition project.”
HO15
“ if you actually read the text.”
NUT1

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes and assignments but do not clearly .

Quizzes
“There is tons of reading, but the and the .”
HO15

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is the most defeating class I have ever taken.”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Pressure

10/100

“Her workload is so overkill.”

⚖️

25/100

“Does not except late work, even if you actually have a good reason.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

43/100

“ if you're looking for .”

👍 Recommendation Risk

35/100

“ 16 week course or the eight week course.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • So responds to messages.
  • Her workload is so overkill.
  • The amount of study of nutrition.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • Hardest teacher I had only because
  • The and counts for a large part of your grade so start early on that assignment.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Leah is awesome!
  • She was really great and always offered help if needed.
  • if you're looking for .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-three reviews across online and and recurring evidence, though some older positive reviews may be less predictive than recent negative ones.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 56
3 out of 51
2 out of 56
1 out of 54

Course coverage

HO1512 reviews
NUTRITION4 reviews
NUTRI13 reviews
NUT12 reviews
NUTRINUTR2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

2

C- 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1