AI Rate Professor

Geology

Emily Wright

GEOLO3 · GEOL1 · GEOL10 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
63.64%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her if you like interactive science classes, but and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardInteractive LessonsMixed GradingHelpful OnlineParticipation MattersUneven Directions
  • Positive reviews praise her creativity, helpfulness, and engaging lessons.
  • , and harsh final assessment.
  • Online feedback is more detailed and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

63/100

High grades are possible, but , and harsh project grading can raise the cost of earning an A.

Online reviews show both leeway and , while in-person reviews show attainable grades with participation.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The science content is often described as simple or fun, but and .

Online content seems creative but , while but requires attention.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation matters often, and in-person students warn that skipping class can hurt performance.

, while online reviews emphasize deadlines and instructions instead.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

and helpfulness, but several strongly negative reviews lower confidence.

Online recommendations are polarized, while but somewhat steadier.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

and leeway, but others report tough or .

Format shift

Online grading is the most inconsistent, while .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Students mention , and many in-class assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews show heavier assignment detail, while and in-class work.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

She is often creative, helpful, and engaging, but and .

Format shift

Online reviews show the strongest split, while but still mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment , and in-class assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews clearly mention quizzes, essays, and projects, while and assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

participation requirements and some harder-to-follow lectures.

Main concern

Attendance and participation appear important, and lectures may require close attention.

What students said

“Relaxed class setting and engaging.”
GEOL10
“Lectures somewhat so pay close attention.”
GEOL1
“Professor Wright's class was relatively simple, even though there was many in-class assignments.”
GEOL10

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are split between fun, helpful instruction and frustration with .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Her lessons are very interactive and creative.”
GEOL10
“ load.”
GEOL1
“She gave 0 straight forward directions bout the .”
GEOLO3

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and essays, with no clear proof of proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Quizzes With Multiple AttemptsShort Answer One AttemptMidterm EssayFinal Essay

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or .

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, a , and final essays, but .

Quizzes With Multiple AttemptsShort Answer One AttemptMidterm EssayFinal Essay
“Quizzes were submitted in 2 parts.”
GEOL10
“Multiple choice where you have 3 attempts and your average score is kept.”
GEOL10
“It seemed that ”
GEOL10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Her lessons are very interactive and creative.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“Emily was such a fun teacher! Her lessons are very interactive and creative.”

⚖️

52/100

“It seemed that unexpected due to the way the first was assessed.”

📚 Workload And Structure

48/100

“There were 2 essays, lots of discussions and lots of ".”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Emily was such a fun teacher! Her lessons are very interactive and creative.
  • Great teacher, would definitely take another one of her classes again and I am not a fan of anything science.
  • Lectures somewhat so pay close attention.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • load.
  • She gave 0 straight forward directions bout the .
  • The classwork is not heavy and you get a lot of leeway.

Theme 3

🧾 About Assignments

  • There were 2 essays, lots of discussions and lots of ".
  • Usually just a 5 question Canvas quiz for homework but .
  • Professor Wright's class was relatively simple, even though there was many in-class assignments.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews across several years and formats provide detailed, consistent themes despite mixed opinions.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

GEOL107 reviews
GEOL13 reviews
GEOLO31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

3

B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1