AI Rate Professor

English

Mary Sue Prangley

E6893 · ENGLISH150 · ENG1A · 1A · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want a and improve your writing.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCaring and supportiveStrong writing feedbackReading and essays heavyRigorous but rewardingAttendance matters
  • Students consistently praise her kindness, enthusiasm, and impact on their writing.
  • The course is rigorous, with , and major essays.
  • Grades are achievable for engaged students, but missed in-class work and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is realistic for engaged students, but , and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content is manageable but intellectually demanding because of , and discussion.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

because in-class work and participation can affect grades.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and improves writing skills.

Recommendation evidence is entirely from in-person students.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

She is not a pushover, but and revisions make strong grades attainable.

Format shift

, and correction opportunities.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The , and major essays, though some students say it is manageable.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students repeatedly describe her as caring, helpful, enthusiastic, and highly effective at teaching writing.

Format shift

Teaching evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment , and in-class writing rather than exams.

Format shift

and writing assignments, not exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a and discussions help students grow.

Main concern

The , and strict consequences for missed in-class work.

What students said

“Very rigorous class, but emerged with a ”
ENG1A
“ .”
ENG1A
“If you dont have a passion for English or you just want an easy A, its better if .”
E6893

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention in-class writing assignments but do not clearly prove a .

In-Class Writing AssignmentsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but webcam, proctoring, open-book, midterm, and final policies are not clearly proven.

In-Class Writing AssignmentsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“You have 3 in class writing assignments.”
ENG1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very rigorous class, but emerged with a ”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“She gives great feedback on papers, which helps build great writing skills.”

👍 Recommendation Level

91/100

“ !”

📚 Workload Reality

45/100

“As .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She breaks things down in a way that you can understand.
  • Prangley is really friendly and enthusiastic.
  • Mary Sue is the and wonderful professor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Very rigorous class, but emerged with a
  • If you dont have a passion for English or you just want an easy A, its better if .
  • She makes you work but the class is fun and it moves quickly.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload and Attendance

  • There are many essays in this course.
  • .
  • She does not let you make up work if you have to miss a day for a game.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews over many years show consistent, detailed patterns about teaching, workload, and attendance.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1A11 reviews
ENGLISH1503 reviews
1A1 review
E68931 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 2 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values