AI Rate Professor

History

William Meriwether

POLISCI10 · HIST8 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you value responsiveness and , but note the small sample and one serious negative review.

Best fit · Effort For RewardResponsive communicatorHelpful and accessibleExtra credit availableMostly recommendedOne professionalism concern
  • Most students describe him as , and clear.
  • and clear expectations make strong grades attainable for students who keep up.
  • One recent in-person review sharply criticizes professionalism, lowering confidence in the overall picture.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Grades appear attainable because students mention and doing fine by keeping up with assignments.

Online evidence is positive but thin, while and strong grades.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The course seems manageable if students keep up with reading and assignments.

Both formats suggest moderate difficulty, but the online evidence is only one review.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly establish an .

Neither online nor .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

and support, but one negative professionalism review prevents a higher score.

The online review is fully positive, while because of one severe complaint.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

and high reported grades suggest grading is fairly forgiving for students who complete the work.

Format shift

, while online reviews do not discuss grading in detail.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Students mention reading and assignments but frame the workload as manageable if they keep up.

Format shift

Workload evidence mainly comes from in-person-coded HIST8 comments.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most reviews praise communication and support, but one review reports severe unprofessionalism.

Format shift

Online evidence is positive, while negative outlier.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews emphasize assignments, reading, participation, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and support, but one review reports severe unprofessionalism.

Main concern

The main concern is inconsistent professionalism feedback in a very small sample.

What students said

“Dr. Meriwether presented a severe lack of professionalism.”
polisci-10
“He also offers plenty of points.”
HIST8
“He is a very responsive professor and really offers help”
HIST8

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online review is positive and and .

Main concern

The online sample is only one review, so confidence is limited.

What students said

“Good teacher, prompt to reply to my questions. .”
polisci-10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-book rules, proctoring, midterms, or finals.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

The online review does not clearly prove .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is a very responsive professor and really offers help when many other of my professors do not.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and professionalism concerns. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“He is a very responsive professor and really offers help when many other of my professors do not.”

👍 Recommendation Level

74/100

“ .”

⚖️

78/100

“He also offers plenty of points.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Communication

  • .
  • Teacher is very good at communicating and answers questions promptly
  • He is a very responsive professor and really offers help

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Work

  • He also offers plenty of points.
  • You just need to keep up with your assignments and fully answer what he is asking for and you will do fine.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • Dr. Meriwether presented a severe lack of professionalism.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

, and one recent review conflicts strongly with the older positive pattern.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HIST82 reviews
polisci-102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values