AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Chris Panza

ALG376 · E380 · HIHJHOPJJ · MATH25 · MATH376 · MATH380 · MATH120 · MATH15 · MATH150 · FALL380 · MATH129 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you are comfortable learning math actively, because some students thrive while others feel lost and unsupported.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed teaching clarityQuiz-heavy structureExtra credit in some classesHelpful when clearSelf-study risk
  • Student experiences are and and disorganized.
  • Some classes offer easy study patterns and , while , and delayed feedback.
  • He is more suitable for students who can study independently and ask for help when lectures do not click.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

67/100

Some students report easy A paths with and predictable tests, but , and heavy finals.

, while the lone online review describes a .

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

Math content is not inherently easy, and several students say .

In-person evidence is mixed, while the online review says the videos were boring and the course was difficult.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

, and understanding, but reviews only mention one concern about missing more than three classes.

; the online review does not clearly discuss attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Recommendations depend heavily on course fit because students are divided between strong praise and serious complaints about clarity.

In-person reviews are polarized, while the single online review is not recommendable.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

61/100

and , but other reviews describe tough grading and hard tests.

Format shift

Online evidence is strict, while hard exams.

Workload

Moderate

49/100

Students , and test preparation, but not a consistently overwhelming workload.

Format shift

The online review reports lots of homework, while but steady work.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

He receives strong praise for clarity and helpfulness from some students, but and weak support.

Format shift

In-person teaching reviews are mixed, and the only online teaching review is negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews repeatedly mention quizzes, tests, midterms, finals, homework-based quizzes, and .

Format shift

Both formats mention quizzes or final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are split between students , and easy and students who found lectures confusing and tests hard.

Main concern

Teaching clarity varies a lot by course and student preparation.

What students said

“ and funny.”
MATH150
“Going to class was pointless because the lectures were so unclear and disorganized.”
MATH120
“Quizzes and and do the work and you will get an A.”
MATH380

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is very negative, citing slow responses, , and boring videos.

Main concern

Slow communication and .

What students said

“Use at ”
MATH150
“Heavy grade on the final.”
MATH150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are central, with mixed reports of predictable tests in some classes and hard or .

Weekly QuizzesHard TestsFinal-Heavy GradingPractice Test

Assessment risk

Standard

46/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention weekly quizzes, tests, midterms, finals, practice tests, and , but .

Weekly QuizzesHard TestsPractice TestCurve
“Expect .”
MATH15
“Quizzes and ”
MATH380
“ ”
MATH380

Online

The online review clearly mentions a but does not prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Final-Heavy Grading
“Heavy grade on the final.”
MATH150

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The class is easy as long as you do the work and pay attention.”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews, highlighting divided , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“ and funny.”

⚖️ Mixed Experience

55/100

“Going to class was pointless because the lectures were so unclear and disorganized.”

📚 Assessment Load

78/100

“Expect .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Clarity

  • and funny.
  • He is absolutley no help.
  • The lecture doesn't help with !

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Tests

  • Do you work and you'll get an easy A, lots of !
  • but they are easy if you actually study for them.
  • Everyone did so horrible on the curve.

Theme 3

🧭 About Student Fit

  • The class is easy as long as you do the work and pay attention.
  • If math is hard for you, this is a teacher that won't hold your hand through it.
  • achieve in life and increase their math knowledge!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 27 reviews over many years with enough detail to show a consistent split in student experiences.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 57
3 out of 53
2 out of 55
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH155 reviews
MATH3805 reviews
MATH1204 reviews
MATH3763 reviews
MATH1502 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH252 reviews
1201 review
ALG3761 review
E3801 review
FALL3801 review
HIHJHOPJJ1 review
MATH1291 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1