AI Rate Professor

Science

Laura Morgan

ENVSC10V1600 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Only take Laura Morgan if you can handle a demanding course with and limited flexibility.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderLots of HomeworkUnapproachableTest HeavyLittle Leeway
  • Students describe the course as tough with lots of homework and test-heavy assessment.
  • Grading and flexibility are viewed negatively, especially around help and personal situations.
  • Students may learn a lot, but the experience feels stressful and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Reported grades are in the B range, and , and test-heavy assessment.

and workload, while in-person evidence adds little leeway and test-heavy structure.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Students call the class tough and , and stressful expectations.

Both online and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

35/100

, but comments show low flexibility around student situations.

Neither format proves an attendance policy, but .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Students do not recommend the experience because , and flexibility feel harsh.

Online feedback is mixed because learning value exists, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students explicitly , and little leeway.

Format shift

, and in-person evidence supports strictness through little leeway.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

Both reviews include lots of homework, and one also describes the class as test heavy.

Format shift

Heavy workload appears in both online and in-person evidence.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Students may learn content, but the professor is described as unapproachable, passive aggressive, and stressful to deal with.

Format shift

Online evidence notes learning value but poor approachability, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

The in-person review tags the class as test heavy, while both reviews also mention lots of homework.

Format shift

, while online evidence mainly supports homework load.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The in-person review emphasizes little leeway, stressful communication, lots of homework, and .

Main concern

Students may feel unsupported when asking for help or explaining personal circumstances.

What students said

“Professor Morgan has little leeway”
ENVSC10V1600
“The class has felt like walking on egg shells.”
ENVSC10V1600

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The online review says the class is tough but educational, with and an unapproachable tone.

Main concern

, and limited approachability make the online experience stressful.

What students said

“Laura did not grade nicely and came across as very unapproachable the whole semester.”
ENVSC10V1600
“This is a tough class but you will definitely learn a lot and have some good conversations!”
ENVSC10V1600

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The course is described as test heavy, but reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Test HeavyExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but does not clearly prove the exam format or rules.

Test HeavyExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“Test heavy”
ENVSC10V1600

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove any exam policy, proctoring rule, webcam requirement, or open-book format.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The class has felt like walking on egg shells.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Laura did not grade nicely and came across as very unapproachable the whole semester.”

⚖️

15/100

“Professor Morgan has little leeway”

📚 Workload Pressure

20/100

“This is a tough class but you will definitely learn a lot and have some good conversations!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Communication

  • Laura did not grade nicely and came across as very unapproachable the whole semester.
  • The class has felt like walking on egg shells.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This is a tough class but you will definitely learn a lot and have some good conversations!
  • Professor Morgan has little leeway

Theme 3

📝

  • Lots of homework
  • Test heavy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are recent enough, format-balanced, and consistent about strictness and workload.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENVSC10V16002 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values