AI Rate Professor

English

Peter Blakemore

ENGLISH150 · ENG1A · ENGL102 · ENLG1B · ENGLISH1A · E7246 · ENGLISH · ENGL10 · ENG1AHIST9 · ENG102 · BM1238 · E7782 · ENGLISH1501A · ENVSC11 · ENGL1B · ENIVR11 · EE11 · ENGLISH1B · ENLISH150 · ENVSC10 · ENGL1A · ENV10H · INTROTOMODERN · 52 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want a and meaningful feedback.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerInspirational discussionsHeavy readingCaring mentorStrong feedbackParticipation matters
  • Students overwhelmingly describe him as one of and a teacher who makes them think deeply.
  • The course usually , and attendance.
  • Grades are attainable with steady effort, but it is not a low-effort class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

A strong grade is realistic if students read, participate, and write consistently, but several reviews say an A requires real effort.

Online and , while in-person reviews add participation and writing as major grade factors.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content is intellectually challenging because readings and , and critical thinking.

The lone online review emphasizes reading load, while , and complex ideas.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Attendance and participation matter because multiple students say missing class hurts the grade or learning experience.

Attendance concerns come mainly from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students recommend him because , and makes challenging material feel worthwhile.

Both formats are positive, but the and more reliable.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

67/100

He is not a free A, but students say clear effort, reading, participation, and .

Format shift

Online evidence is limited to one positive A review, while but .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Many students , and discussion preparation.

Format shift

, but in-person reviews provide much more detail.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students repeatedly call him inspiring, caring, insightful, and one of the .

Format shift

Online and confidence from many in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Reviews , and participation, with few or no tests in some classes.

Format shift

, while the online review does not specify assessment format.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews strongly praise his teaching, discussions, care, and feedback while and participation expectations.

Main concern

Students who dislike reading or class discussion may struggle.

What students said

“He is the .”
E7782
“Read read read, and when in doubt read some more.”
ENVSC10

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review is very positive but warns that the .

Main concern

Keeping up with .

What students said

“ - but !”
ENVSC11

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because reviews emphasize papers, reading responses, and few or no tests rather than proctored exams.

Few TestsTake-Home Write-UpsAssignment-Based

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and take-home write-ups in some courses, but they do not prove a universal exam policy.

Few TestsNo TestsTake-Home Write-Ups
“ ”
ENVSC10
“Lots of reading, 5 papers, no tests.”
EE11

Online

The online review does not clearly describe .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is the . I learned more in his class than in any other.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“The .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“ !!”

📚 Workload

30/100

“Read read read, and when in doubt read some more.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The lectures were in-depth and left you thinking and wondering.
  • He facilitates class discussions in such a way that pulls you into deeper levels of thought regarding the assigned readings.
  • Peter is a heck of a professor, and a heck of an individual, in general.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It was an easy A for me but that's because I kept up on the reading.
  • this ethics class is a hard one to get an A in.
  • You need to show up and earn your grade (duh), but he will always help .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • Peter will fight on behalf of your education.
  • He will always work with so it's not hard to score well in his class, but it is work.
  • Very encouraging and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

52

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years show a consistent pattern of , and strong student approval.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 531
4 out of 515
3 out of 54
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENVSC118 reviews
EE115 reviews
ENGLISH1A5 reviews
ENGLISH1B5 reviews
ENG1A4 reviews
Show 18 more courses
ENGL1A3 reviews
ENGL1022 reviews
ENGLISH1502 reviews
ENVSC102 reviews
BM12381 review
E72461 review
E77821 review
ENG1021 review
ENG1AHIST91 review
ENGL101 review
ENGL1B1 review
ENGLISH1 review
ENGLISH1501A1 review
ENIVR111 review
ENLG1B1 review
ENLISH1501 review
ENV10H1 review
INTROTOMODERN1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 2 · A 10 · A- 2

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1