AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Anthony Luehrs

MATH380 · MATH25 · MATH50A · MATH3 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if , and a teacher who makes students feel supported.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear lecturesCaring teacherFunny and engagingHelpful feedbackLenient quiz policies
  • Students consistently describe Luehrs as , and unusually strong at explaining math.
  • The course is not effortless, especially in advanced math, but students feel supported and fairly evaluated.
  • Online evidence is limited but still positive, with and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Getting an A seems realistic with steady work because grading and quizzes are fair, but students do not describe the class as effortless.

Online evidence mentions straightforward exams and , while and lenient quiz makeup policies.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The math content can require effort, but and pacing make it much easier to understand.

Online evidence suggests a manageable structure, while math material.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

Attendance rules are not clearly stated, but after absences.

Only in-person evidence directly mentions absence flexibility, and the online .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend him because he , and makes math enjoyable.

Both online and in-person reviews are positive, though because it has more reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Grades appear fair and somewhat lenient, especially with and .

Format shift

Online evidence says exams were straightforward, while and lenient quiz makeup.

Workload

Moderate

64/100

Workload is steady but not excessive, with and higher expectations in advanced math classes.

Format shift

The online review names weekly homework, while volume.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students repeatedly praise , and care for student understanding.

Format shift

The online review is positive, and the larger in-person set strongly confirms excellent teaching quality.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment appears to include exams, quizzes, homework, and .

Format shift

Online evidence clearly mentions a midterm, final, and homework, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews strongly praise his , and supportive classroom environment.

Main concern

He expects real effort, especially in advanced math classes.

What students said

“ and .”
MATH50A
“Expects a lot from his students, especially in some of the more advanced math classes, but does it in such a way that you are left empowered, not exasperated.”
MATH50A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review describes a fun class with straightforward exams and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“There was a midterm and a .”
MATH25
“ but not a crazy amount.”
MATH25

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam and quiz evidence is limited but student-friendly, with and .

Straightforward MidtermStraightforward FinalHomework Study Guide On QuizzesLenient Quiz Makeup

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but one review says homework could be used as a quiz study guide and quiz makeups were lenient.

Homework Study Guide On QuizzesLenient Quiz Makeup
“ as a , and is pretty lenient with making up quizzes if you're absent.”
MATH380

Online

The online review explicitly says the midterm and .

Straightforward MidtermStraightforward Final
“There was a midterm and a .”
MATH25

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Definitely one of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“ complete understanding of the material.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“If you have the :)”

⚖️

78/100

“ as a , and is pretty lenient with making up quizzes if you're absent.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and .
  • and easy ways to remember important things.
  • He makes sure everyone understands before he moves on to something else.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Expects a lot from his students, especially in some of the more advanced math classes, but does it in such a way that you are left empowered, not exasperated.
  • There was a midterm and a .
  • but not a crazy amount.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He really cares about making sure his students understand the material, as opposed to just trying to get through all of it.
  • I really like his vibe and feel comfortable in class.
  • He's funny and makes class fun.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews across several years are detailed, consistent, and strongly aligned in praising his teaching.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH3803 reviews
MATH50A2 reviews
MATH251 review
MATH31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1