AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Erik Kramer

PHYS4A · MATH120 · MATH25 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you are comfortable pushing through difficult math or physics and asking for .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing TeachingHelpful When ClearConfusing LecturesHigh DifficultyNeeds Self-Advocacy
  • Student experiences are and extremely .
  • The course does not look like an easy A because difficulty is high and support appears inconsistent.
  • All evidence is from in-person classes, with no online review data.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A seems possible for strong, persistent students, but the comments show high difficulty and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The material appears challenging because and high difficulty ratings.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews mention the class experience, and they do not establish an .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation depends heavily on fit because students either found him clear and .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

, and the high difficulty comments keep the score below average.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload is not described in detail, but homework timing and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Teaching quality is polarizing, with strong praise for instruction.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Comments mention homework and tests, but the .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are highly divided, with and others saying the class was confusing and hard to survive.

Main concern

and high difficulty.

What students said

“ .”
PHYS4A
“ . horrible at explaining the subject”
MATH120
“All I can say is run away from his class.”
MATH120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests but do not clearly prove the .

Tests MentionedExam Preparation Unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and testing-center logistics but do not clearly prove book policy or .

Tests MentionedTesting Center Concern
“ ”
MATH120
“you have to REMIND ”
MATH120

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Erik Kramer is a great teacher for students who actually want to learn something.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching clarity, support, and difficulty. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“ and in simple terms that are easier to understand.”

⚠️

35/100

“All I can say is run away from his class.”

📈 Difficulty

35/100

“if i pass his class it will be a miracle because he is bad at teaching.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • and in simple terms that are easier to understand.
  • horrible at explaining the subject

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Support

  • he will guide you to the right answer so you can figure it out
  • He is available after class and in the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

, but the evidence is old and limited.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1203 reviews
MATH251 review
PHYS4A1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not_Sure_Yet 2