AI Rate Professor

Biology

Colette Beaupre

BIO100 · AG23 · BIOLOGY1 · BIOL1 · BIO1 · BIO101 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want a manageable biology class and can tolerate dry, uneven lectures.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but unclearEasy grading pathBoring lecturesStudy guides helpLab attendance matters
  • Students often describe her as kind, helpful, and willing to answer questions.
  • The course is usually easy to pass if students attend, use study guides, and .
  • Teaching quality is inconsistent because .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Getting an A or B appears realistic with , and basic effort rather than intense studying.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The content is described as easy introductory biology, but follow.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person classes.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

because labs and class coverage are tied closely to passing and grades.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

and an easy path to pass, but many criticize her lecture quality.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Grades seem forgiving when students attend, follow study guides, and complete lab work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

80/100

Reviews mention little homework, study guides, and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Average

56/100

She is caring and knowledgeable, but many students .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

, and some participation rather than relying on one method.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show a but weak lecture clarity.

Main concern

.

What students said

“she's so sweet and helpful.”
BIO1
“her lectures can be and not necessarily in a linear fashion.”
BIOL1
“If you go to class and do the work, it's an easy A/B.”
AG23

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention study guides and book-based tests, but .

Study Guides Before TestsTests Based On BookLabs Affect Grades

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests, but exam rules are not clearly described.

Study Guides Before TestsTests Based On Book
“Her study guides are really straight forward, so study it and you will do great.”
BIO1
“ .”
BIOL1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's a great SCIENTIST, not a great teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

56/100

“She's a great SCIENTIST, not a great teacher.”

📈 Grade Path

82/100

“If you go to class and do the work, it's an easy A/B.”

⚠️ Lecture Clarity

45/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she's so sweet and helpful.
  • her lectures can be and not necessarily in a linear fashion.
  • Monotonous & boring lectures served with a monotone voice.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She made biology an extremely easy class, as long as you show up for lecture and lab and read the book you will do well.
  • The class is easy because she gives you study guides for the tests, and goes over the labs in class.
  • A majority of so go to class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews across many years show consistent , and weak lectures.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 53
3 out of 55
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

BIO16 reviews
AG232 reviews
BIOL12 reviews
BIO1001 review
BIO1011 review
Show 1 more courses
BIOLOGY11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values