AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Nicola Walters

PSCI110 · POLSC10V0929 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
50/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

because the experience appears highly format-dependent and based on very limited evidence.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFormat-dependent experienceEasy expectations in personPoor online supportRude feedback concernReading and tests
  • the online student strongly warns against her, while the +.
  • Online concerns include poor course setup, , and .
  • and an easy grade, but the sample is too small for confidence.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

60/100

The +, but the online review reports a much harder and more frustrating path.

, while online evidence suggests much higher effort and lower reward.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The course seems easy in person but difficult online , and .

Online and in-person reviews directly conflict, so the overall course-easiness score is blended.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do not clearly .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation is split evenly, with one strong online warning and one strong in-person approval.

, while in-person evidence says the class is easy and successful.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

The , but the online B- and negative feedback suggest stricter or .

Format shift

, while online grading feels harsher to the reviewer.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The online review reports lots of , and tests, while the .

Format shift

Heavy workload evidence comes only from the online review.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

One review describes unprofessional online teaching, while the .

Format shift

Teaching experience appears much worse online than in person, but evidence is minimal.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

The only concrete assessment evidence comes from online tags describing a and homework.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions tests and homework, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The and says expectations were easy to follow for a good grade.

Main concern

There is .

What students said

“Easy to follow her expectations and recieve a good grade.”
PSCI110

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is strongly negative and , and tests.

Main concern

Online students may face weak support and .

What students said

“She doesn't seem to understand how online courses work, and will give .”
POLSC10V0929

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a test-heavy online class but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, closed-book, midterm, or .

Test HeavyExam Rules Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The .

Online

The online review supports a test-heavy structure but does not clearly prove webcam, .

Test Heavy
“Test heavy”
POLSC10V0929

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She doesn't seem to understand how online courses work, and will give .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting the sharp split between online and in-person experiences; credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Online Risk

30/100

“She doesn't seem to understand how online courses work, and will give .”

📈

80/100

“Easy to follow her expectations and recieve a good grade.”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“ .”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Experience

  • The book was improperly ordered by the professor and she refused to upload PDFs of the book.
  • She doesn't seem to understand how online courses work, and will give .

Theme 2

🏫

  • Easy to follow her expectations and recieve a good grade.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews exist, one online and one in person, with completely opposite experiences.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

POLSC10V09291 review
PSCI1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values