AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

David Owren

PHIL15 · PHIL10 · PHI10 · PHIL1 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

if you want a low-stress philosophy class and can tolerate slow or wandering lectures.

Best fit · Easy A HunterLaid backTake-home testsCaringCan be boringFew graded items
  • Students often describe him as kind, fair, supportive, and low-stress.
  • The course is generally easy to pass, with and .
  • Teaching reactions are mixed because some students find him interesting while others find lectures dull or off topic.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

89/100

Grades are highly attainable because students mention , and a helpful professor.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The course is low-stress and not work-heavy, but philosophy concepts and .

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Attendance appears important because one review says skipping class will hurt, but .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

, and easy course structure, despite boredom complaints.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Grading appears generous because students mention , and professors helping students pass.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

82/100

Workload is light because reviews , and presentations.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

He is caring and fair, but teaching quality is reduced by repeated complaints about boring or unfocused lectures.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment includes papers, exams, a , and very few graded items.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

All evidence is in person and shows a but uneven lecture engagement.

Main concern

Lectures can feel boring, off topic, or and depth.

What students said

“This class was super laid back.”
PHIL15
“All the .”
PHIL10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally student-friendly because and easy or manageable assessments.

Take-Home TestsEasy TestsFew ExamsFinal Presentation

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a small number of exams or assignments.

Take-Home TestsEasy TestsTwo ExamsFinal Presentation
“He gave .”
PHIL15
“All the .”
PHIL10
“ if you just study for them.”
PHIL10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Interesting man, .”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“He is really invested in making sure students understand assignments, and he is willing to help you pass the class.”

📈 Easy A Potential

89/100

“ and .”

📝

88/100

“He gave .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is really invested in making sure students understand assignments, and he is willing to help you pass the class.
  • Very nice teacher, he really wants his students .
  • This was the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class was super laid back.
  • .
  • I didn't read a word, but I showed up more than he did.

Theme 3

📝

  • You will have 2 papers, 2 exams, and a .
  • Grade is based on 2 exam and 1 paper that you have all semester to write.
  • All the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

and consistent evidence, but there is no online evidence.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 58
3 out of 55
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL1510 reviews
PHIL15 reviews
PHIL105 reviews
PHI101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1