AI Rate Professor

Business

Sandra Rowan

BUIS10 · BUS34 · BUSS34 · BUSN10 · BUS5 · BUS10 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

unless you can self-teach the material and , and poor communication.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized teachingHarsh gradingConfusing assignmentsPoor communicationTest-heavy course
  • Most students , and poor communication across both formats.
  • Many say the course material itself is simple, but her teaching and .
  • Online reviews especially criticize late posts, weak tech use, component, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Some students earned high grades, but comments , and badly worded tests that make the A costly.

Online and and clarity problems, with online students adding late posts and poor platform use.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Several reviews say the business material is simple, but the course feels harder because instructions and .

Both formats suggest the content is not the main problem; the teaching and organization create the difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Tags and comments suggest attendance or active participation matters, but as valuable learning support.

, while online reviews emphasize schedule disruption from late assignments.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

6/100

Students overwhelmingly do not recommend her because they describe , and weak communication.

Both online and focused more on tech use and responsiveness.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students repeatedly report harsh , and unclear expectations.

Format shift

Both formats include harsh-grading complaints, with online reviews especially noting grammar and formatting deductions.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload is not praised as huge every week, but students describe heavy reading, long discussions, , and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention late assignments, long discussions, and textbook reading, while and reading.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Reviews consistently describe her as , and unable to teach the material effectively.

Format shift

Both online and in-person reviews report poor teaching, with online reviews adding component and weak platform use.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Assessment appears to combine exams, quizzes, , and written assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize quizzes, exams, discussions, and textbook work, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are also very negative, with repeated complaints , and disorganization.

Main concern

The main concern is that students say she does not clearly teach or .

What students said

“Grades terribly and no clarity at all in the assignments.”
BUS10
“The .”
BUS10
“Run if you see her name!”
BUS10

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, emphasizing late assignments, weak communication, component, textbook-heavy work, and .

Main concern

The main concern is that students feel while and weak online organization.

What students said

“She gives no study guides for , and .”
BUS10
“AVOID. can accommodate.”
BUS10
“She has component, instead the student just reads the textbook to do the work.”
BUS10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are described as test-heavy, poorly prepared, and memorization-focused, but reviews .

Test HeavyNo Study GuidesMemorization ExamsBadly Worded QuizzesReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Policy

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but reviews do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring policy.

Tests Are ToughBadly Worded TestsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“ ”
BUS10
“Her tests and so you are guareented a low grade.”
BUS10
“get good grades on all the !”
BUS34

Online

Online reviews describe exams with no study guides, memorization of textbook wording, and quizzes, but reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

No Study GuidesMemorization ExamsQuizzesReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Policy
“She gives no study guides for , and .”
BUS10
“ .”
BUS10
“just read the book and ”
BUS10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Run if you see her name!”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“She's a nice lady, but she has no clue how to teach.”

⚖️

12/100

“Grades harshly and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

6/100

“Save .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The teacher has good intentions and wants students to learn and do well, but she is very disorganised and unprepared.
  • She is constantly late and never teachers any of the material we are supposed to get through.
  • She seems to not care about what students have to say or ask.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Course material is pretty simple but she makes it needlessly convoluted.
  • Grades terribly and no clarity at all in the assignments.
  • because her communication is awful not because the course matter is difficult.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • .
  • She has component, instead the student just reads the textbook to do the work.
  • She doesn't know how to use the online platform, which adds to the confusion.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-six reviews across many years are detailed, consistent, and overwhelmingly negative across both online and in-person experiences.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 518

Course coverage

BUS1016 reviews
BUS344 reviews
BUIS103 reviews
BUS51 review
BUSN101 review
Show 1 more courses
BUSS341 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1