AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kenneth Owens

MATH15 · MATH109 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want a strong math teacher and are willing to attend consistently for challenging material.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerClear explanationsAbstract materialEngaging examplesLow busyworkAttendance matters
  • , and ability to make math more digestible.
  • The material can still be abstract and difficult, especially for students not already comfortable with math.
  • Workload seems light and purposeful, but because missed lessons are hard to replace.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Good teaching, , and little busywork help, but abstract material and reports of failures mean an A still takes real effort.

All evidence comes from two in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The course content is intellectually challenging because statistics and math concepts are described as abstract, even with .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they show strong teaching but difficult math content.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

because one and missed lessons cannot be made up.

Attendance evidence comes only from the in-person MATH15 review.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Both students would take him again because , and focused on what matters.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

65/100

Grading seems fair with and , but the class is not an automatic high grade because students can still fail.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

78/100

Students say he avoids unnecessary work and uses relevant activities rather than busywork.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload, and they suggest the work is focused and manageable.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students describe him as , and highly effective at explaining difficult math.

Format shift

Teaching and is strongly positive.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention participation, few graded items, , and class activities, but do not show a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and low busywork, while warning that abstract math material and .

Main concern

The main concern is that abstract material can leave some students lost despite good teaching.

What students said

“Fantastic professor if you are into math.”
MATH15
“the material is so abstract some people are still lost.”
MATH15
“He knows how to explain things in way that makes it easier for the students to digest.”
MATH109

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or major exam requirements.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“In short, THE PERFECT PROFESSOR.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, difficulty, workload, and attendance; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“He knows how to explain things in way that makes it easier for the students to digest.”

📚 Course Challenge

38/100

“the material is so abstract some people are still lost.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

88/100

“Fantastic professor if you are into math.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He tries really hard to
  • He knows how to explain things in way that makes it easier for the students to digest.
  • His teaching style just matches my mindset.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • the material is so abstract some people are still lost.
  • I saw a lot of people fail.
  • It was my 2nd try at the material and I got an A.

Theme 3

🧭 About Class Expectations

  • the lessons.
  • he won't give you unnecessary work to do.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

, so the comments are useful but too limited for high confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1091 review
MATH151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values