AI Rate Professor

Information Science

Montel Vanderhorck

DM10 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you like passionate instruction and can handle a lecture-heavy, style-dependent class.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPatientPassionateInteresting CourseLecture HeavyMixed Communication
  • Students describe him as patient, passionate, and capable of making the course interesting.
  • One review says his teaching style is specific and may not work for everyone.
  • Communication and lecture balance are the main risks.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

The course can be rewarding, but and one student found the workload and style demanding.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The content ranges from easy for one student to difficult for others, suggesting standard but uneven challenge.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do not clearly .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Recommended with caution because two students praised him strongly, while .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

, and available grade evidence is too limited to judge leniency strongly.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The class includes lecture and group work, but reviews do not consistently describe the workload as light or heavy.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

He is praised as patient, passionate, and interesting, but one review flags uneven communication and balance.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Reviews mention group projects and lectures, but do .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

but lean positive, with strong praise for patience and engagement alongside concerns about communication balance.

Main concern

His teaching style and communication may feel overwhelming or inconsistent.

What students said

“Montel is a very patient and passionate professor.”
DM10
“his communication sometimes felt overwhelming, and sometimes absent.”
DM10
“Cool teacher and keep the course interesting.”
DM10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The format, proctoring, or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Montel is a very patient and passionate professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“Montel is a very patient and passionate professor.”

⚠️ Teaching Fit

50/100

“has a very specific teaching style that may not work for everyone.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

68/100

“I was extremely pleased with the knowledge I gained!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is a good guy, but has a very specific teaching style that may not work for everyone.
  • Montel is a very patient and passionate professor.
  • Cool teacher and keep the course interesting.

Theme 2

📚 About Learning Value

  • I learned cool things in his class
  • I was extremely pleased with the knowledge I gained!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication

  • his communication sometimes felt overwhelming, and sometimes absent.
  • He should strive for better balance in these areas: time spent in lecture, time spent teaching each student, and time spent teaching each program.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

but are spread across years and show mixed experiences.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

DM103 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1