AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Deborah Silva

BUS16 · CIS100 · CIS5051 · BT50 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
23/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Avoid unless you can work independently and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnpreparedSlow responsesUnclear assignmentsHelpful when engagedMixed teaching quality
  • Recent reviews describe poor preparation, lateness, and .
  • Older positive , and enjoyable.
  • The overall pattern is risky because negative comments are specific and repeated.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

50/100

Grades are not documented, and the low average difficulty suggests the work may be manageable but not clearly an easy A.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online grade evidence.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

The course content appears manageable, but and weak explanations can make it harder than the material itself.

, so no online comparison is available.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

All reviews are in person, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most recent detailed reviews advise against taking her because of , and delayed responses.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

There is not enough grade or estimate.

Format shift

All evidence is in person, and .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Reviews do not report heavy workload, but .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Teaching quality is hurt by repeated reports of , and slow help.

Format shift

In-person comments are mixed, but the most recent reviews are strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The only .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are sharply mixed, with recent students reporting poor organization and delayed help while older students praise her clarity and support.

Main concern

Students may struggle with , and inconsistent preparation.

What students said

“Always late, never prepared, wastes student's time.”
BT50
“Took weeks to get back to me with any ”
BUS16
“ and very willing to help”
CIS100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or .

Exam policy unclear

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Horrible instructor. Always late, never prepared, wastes student's time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, organization, and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“Always late, never prepared, wastes student's time.”

⚠️ Student Support

25/100

“Took weeks to get back to me with any ”

👍 Positive Counterpoint

60/100

“ and very willing to help”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Horrible instructor.
  • Debbie talks too much and does not provide references to the materials she talks about.
  • Ms. Silva was a great teacher I took her class a couple of years ago

Theme 2

📌 About Organization

  • Always late, never prepared, wastes student's time.
  • Fell behind on assignments and .

Theme 3

❤️ About Helpfulness

  • and very willing to help
  • she was very helpful in every aspect of the learning process

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews span several years with detailed but conflicting comments, and the most recent evidence is negative.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

BT502 reviews
BUS161 review
CIS1001 review
CIS50511 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values