AI Rate Professor

Languages

Kerry Mayer

SPEEC7 · SPCH1 · SPEECH1 · COMM7 · SOC1 · SPEECH7 · COMM5 · SP7 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
55/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you can meet deadlines, attend consistently, and handle a strict but often engaging communication course.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFun and energeticTough graderStrict deadlinesHeavy reading and quizzesMixed fairness
  • Many students find her lively, witty, and effective at making communication classes engaging.
  • , and reading make the course effort-heavy.
  • Negative reviews focus on unclear expectations, limited flexibility, and perceived unfairness.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

43/100

An A is possible, but students describe tough , and heavy reading.

Both formats show strict expectations, with online emphasizing late-work rules and , and attendance.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The material is not described as conceptually extreme, but speeches, reading, quizzes, and .

In-person reviews provide most difficulty evidence, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

because missed classes, deadlines, and participation can strongly affect grades.

and class presence more clearly than online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

56/100

Recommendation depends on whether students value her energy and and limited flexibility.

Online reviews are split, and and serious fairness complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Multiple students call her a tough or and describe strict deadlines with little flexibility.

Format shift

Strict grading appears in both formats, especially online late-work rules and .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students mention many assignments, lots of , and firm deadlines.

Format shift

Online reviews mention many assignments, while , and hard work.

Teaching experience

Average

63/100

She is often praised as fun, energetic, witty, and helpful, but serious complaints about fairness and clarity reduce confidence.

Format shift

Both formats are mixed, with online split evenly and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

34/100

Assessment evidence centers on speeches, quizzes, readings, assignments, deadlines, and .

Format shift

Online evidence points to assignments and deadlines, while , and reading.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show an engaging, energetic teacher, but also a , and speech expectations.

Main concern

Students must keep up with , and .

What students said

“You have to be on top of your work and never miss deadlines because she does hold to them.”
SPEECH1
“Lots of quizzes (2 per week) and YOU MUST READ THE TEXT AND THEN SOME.”
SPEEC7
“She made me WANT to go to class.”
SPCH1

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are and comfort versus strict timelines and no late-work flexibility.

Main concern

Late work and falling behind are punished heavily.

What students said

“ and makes you feel comfortable.”
COMM7
“She doesn't accept late work and you should expect do to a lot of ”
COMM7

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, midterms, or finals.

Frequent Quizzes
“Lots of quizzes (2 per week)”
SPEEC7
“ .”
SPCH1

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, take-home, quiz, midterm, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Toughie but a goodie. I actually wanted to go to class. Energetic, great lecturer.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and fairness. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

63/100

“Kerry is very no-nonsense but also hilarious!!”

⚖️

28/100

“She's a , but gives solid feed back and is willing to help you improve.”

📚 Workload Demand

30/100

“Lots of quizzes (2 per week) and YOU MUST READ THE TEXT AND THEN SOME.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She made me WANT to go to class.
  • Fun, energetic, and down to earth.
  • Energetic, great lecturer.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You have to be on top of your work and never miss deadlines because she does hold to them.
  • thing to to please.
  • She doesn't accept late work and you should expect do to a lot of

Theme 3

⚠️ About Fairness Concerns

  • She isn't super clear about what she wants from her students
  • I went from an A to an F without any sympathy.
  • This

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen reviews across many years give detailed and recurring evidence , and deadlines.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

SPCH16 reviews
COMM75 reviews
SPEECH12 reviews
COMM51 review
SOC11 review
Show 3 more courses
SP71 review
SPEEC71 review
SPEECH71 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1