AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Skip Smith

SOC2 · ANTH3 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

Take Skip Smith only if you can tolerate opinionated lectures and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardFunny but opinionatedEasy examsReading requiredCaring but story-heavy
  • Exams are described as very easy and not study-heavy.
  • Students should keep up with textbook reading because weekly quizzes matter.
  • Teaching tone is mixed, with caring comments balanced by concerns about bias and embarrassing students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Getting an A appears fairly easy if students read for , because as super easy and not study-heavy.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course content sounds manageable, but .

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Students may like his humor and caring side, but concerns about bias and making students feel embarrassed limit the recommendation.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

because exams are described as very easy, though there is .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Weekly quizzes and textbook reading create steady work, but students do not describe the workload as heavy.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

He is described as funny, caring, and interested, but also opinionated and sometimes dismissive toward questions.

Format shift

, and they are mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears to combine weekly quizzes with .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and a personable instructor, but also note biased lectures, repeated stories, and a need to read the textbook.

Main concern

Some students may dislike his opinionated style and .

What students said

“ and are super easy.”
ANTH3
“Those who don't like to read the .”
SOC2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as easy essay questions, but reviews .

Essay ExamsEasy Exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, with no clear proof of open-book or closed-book policy.

Essay ExamsEasy Exams
“ and are super easy.”
ANTH3

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ but he seems very opinionated and bias during lectures.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and exams. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“Great guy altogether - likes to tell a few too many stories.”

📈 Easy Exams

82/100

“I did not have to study hard at all.”

⚠️ Classroom Tone

48/100

“When students ask him a question, he makes them feel dumb and embarrased.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • but he seems very opinionated and bias during lectures.
  • Extremely caring and .

Theme 2

📚

  • , so it's good to read the chapters before class.
  • and are super easy.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, so the pattern is useful but weak.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ANTH31 review
SOC21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values